Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34741 - 34750 of 83278 for case search.
Search results 34741 - 34750 of 83278 for case search.
[PDF]
NOTICE
¶1 BLANCHARD, J.1 Beth Ann Lovern appeals from an order in a postjudgment divorce case finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56326 - 2014-09-15
¶1 BLANCHARD, J.1 Beth Ann Lovern appeals from an order in a postjudgment divorce case finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56326 - 2014-09-15
State v. Alphonso Miller
The supreme court’s decision reversing our opinion in Carprue is determinative of this case, and leads us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17945 - 2005-04-27
The supreme court’s decision reversing our opinion in Carprue is determinative of this case, and leads us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17945 - 2005-04-27
State v. Timothy R. Pamonicutt
penalties, the judgment and order are affirmed. The procedure in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10513 - 2005-03-31
penalties, the judgment and order are affirmed. The procedure in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10513 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
agreed to handle Mr. Madden’s case after the co-defendants, and that’s based on Mr. Madden’s degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66201 - 2011-06-20
agreed to handle Mr. Madden’s case after the co-defendants, and that’s based on Mr. Madden’s degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66201 - 2011-06-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
no-contest pleas to the burglary as a repeater count in this case and two counts of misdemeanor retail
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254999 - 2020-02-25
no-contest pleas to the burglary as a repeater count in this case and two counts of misdemeanor retail
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254999 - 2020-02-25
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146987 - 2015-08-19
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146987 - 2015-08-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for No. 2015AP1121-CR 2 summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194569 - 2017-09-21
at conference that this case is appropriate for No. 2015AP1121-CR 2 summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194569 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Waukesha County v. Devlin D.D.
.” The trial court determined that the case should be dismissed because although it had jurisdiction, venue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13634 - 2017-09-21
.” The trial court determined that the case should be dismissed because although it had jurisdiction, venue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13634 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103112 - 2013-10-14
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103112 - 2013-10-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is unconstitutional. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=442352 - 2021-10-20
is unconstitutional. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=442352 - 2021-10-20