Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34741 - 34750 of 40262 for financial disclosure statements.

State v. Cleveland Brown, Jr.
statements indicate a clear understanding of the elements of the offense.” In sum, the trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10524 - 2005-03-31

Paul J. May v. Tri-County Trails Commission
The statements of the circuit court regarding Tri-County Trails’ obligation to fence, made prior to the dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12145 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
In his opening statement, Hughes’s attorney explained to jurors that of the various elements of escape
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64241 - 2011-06-28

State v. Christa Brojanac
. ¶7 Schrang’s observations of the interior of the car confirmed Brojanac’s statement that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2963 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Darin C. Anderson
,” and “there was no forcing or causing by the defendant.” The court made a statement effectively adopting Anderson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5768 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Luz O.
language in § 48.355(2)(b)7. requiring dispositional orders to contain statements of the conditions upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7328 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for believing the truth of the challenged document, and (2) the statements made in the document were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258328 - 2020-04-21

[PDF] State v. Leonard V. Lauth
of the Constitution. Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420, 436-37 (1984). Statements given and items seized during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11802 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to pretrial motions, jury selection, opening statements, Gatlin’s decision to testify, the jury instructions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771426 - 2024-03-07

State v. Leonard A. Sarnowski
explaining the finding, the trial court recognized that it was presented with “competing statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7371 - 2005-03-31