Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34741 - 34750 of 82604 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.

[PDF] State v. Linda R. Cauley
. APPEALS from orders of the circuit court for Price County: DOUGLAS T. FOX, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9590 - 2017-09-19

State v. Richard E. Davis
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14557 - 2005-03-31

F.M. Management Company Limited Partnership v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
, Respondent-Respondent. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6574 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Michael J. Cauley
. APPEALS from orders of the circuit court for Price County: DOUGLAS T. FOX, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9637 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] F.M. Management Company Limited Partnership v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MAXINE A. WHITE, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6574 - 2017-09-19

James R. Lasky v. City of Stevens Point
parked his car at Bukolt Park and was walking on the Riverfront Trail in order to go to the bakery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13035 - 2005-03-31

State v. Roy Malvitz
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12380 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jason C. Kinstler
should be granted and the case remanded to the trial court in order to allow Kinstler to withdraw his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13094 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jason C. Kinstler
in order to allow Kinstler to withdraw his guilty pleas. La Crosse County deputy sheriff Michael
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13094 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36413 - 2009-05-06