Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34751 - 34760 of 65884 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 34751 - 34760 of 65884 for divorce records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
in the record that Stewart “verbally acknowledged his understanding” that the court could exceed the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56193 - 2010-11-02
in the record that Stewart “verbally acknowledged his understanding” that the court could exceed the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56193 - 2010-11-02
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that the appeal may be disposed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107222 - 2014-01-28
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that the appeal may be disposed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107222 - 2014-01-28
CA Blank Order
. Stat. Rule 809.21. After our independent review of the records, we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93229 - 2013-02-19
. Stat. Rule 809.21. After our independent review of the records, we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93229 - 2013-02-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247150 - 2019-09-25
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247150 - 2019-09-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the no-merit report and conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213969 - 2018-06-05
the no-merit report and conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213969 - 2018-06-05
[PDF]
State v. LaPonzo Monroe Dallas
filed and the appeal submitted to the court, the appellant moved to supplement the record. It appears
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19523 - 2017-09-21
filed and the appeal submitted to the court, the appellant moved to supplement the record. It appears
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19523 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and an independent review of the record, we reject the no-merit report because there is a potential issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255334 - 2020-02-24
, and an independent review of the record, we reject the no-merit report because there is a potential issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255334 - 2020-02-24
[PDF]
Ronald E. Patten v. David H. Schwarz
such a consideration. We reject the argument. There is no evidence in the record that the directive was in effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13106 - 2017-09-21
such a consideration. We reject the argument. There is no evidence in the record that the directive was in effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13106 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218893 - 2018-09-12
of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218893 - 2018-09-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375649 - 2021-06-10
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375649 - 2021-06-10