Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34771 - 34780 of 83216 for case code.
Search results 34771 - 34780 of 83216 for case code.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶2 The State charged Bostick in Racine County case no. 2009CF21 with first-degree intentional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234713 - 2019-02-20
. ¶2 The State charged Bostick in Racine County case no. 2009CF21 with first-degree intentional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234713 - 2019-02-20
State v. Emmanuel O. Okoronta
Wisconsin case law setting forth and applying the standard for when jurors may be removed for cause. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3101 - 2005-03-31
Wisconsin case law setting forth and applying the standard for when jurors may be removed for cause. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3101 - 2005-03-31
Joshua D. Hansen v. Carl H. Degnitz
2005 WI App 90 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2004AP116 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17882 - 2005-05-24
2005 WI App 90 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2004AP116 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17882 - 2005-05-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
The no-merit report sets forth the procedural history of the case and addresses the validity of Dobbins’ plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955204 - 2025-05-13
The no-merit report sets forth the procedural history of the case and addresses the validity of Dobbins’ plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955204 - 2025-05-13
COURT OF APPEALS
exercised its discretion by reopening the case for additional evidence and that the officer unlawfully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118930 - 2014-08-04
exercised its discretion by reopening the case for additional evidence and that the officer unlawfully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118930 - 2014-08-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239893 - 2019-04-25
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239893 - 2019-04-25
State v. Antonio J. Spencer
)(am) (1995‑96), authorizing a six‑person jury in misdemeanor cases, was unconstitutional.[5] Hansford
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3280 - 2005-03-31
)(am) (1995‑96), authorizing a six‑person jury in misdemeanor cases, was unconstitutional.[5] Hansford
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3280 - 2005-03-31
Robert C. McRoberts, Jr. v. Toni L. Kant
to settle the case soon and, based on the plan documents produced in discovery, he did not think Mason Shoe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24853 - 2006-04-17
to settle the case soon and, based on the plan documents produced in discovery, he did not think Mason Shoe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24853 - 2006-04-17
Milwaukee County v. Louise M.
PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8577 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8577 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Lacrosse County Department of Social Services v. Rose K.
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8449 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8449 - 2017-09-19