Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34781 - 34790 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
Search results 34781 - 34790 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
State v. James M. Smith
to appoint counsel and expressed a desire to dispose of the case. Smith wrote the trial court again
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8273 - 2005-03-31
to appoint counsel and expressed a desire to dispose of the case. Smith wrote the trial court again
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8273 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on the motion because Jackson made a prima facie case that the circuit court had accepted his plea without
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105853 - 2017-09-21
on the motion because Jackson made a prima facie case that the circuit court had accepted his plea without
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105853 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and six spent casings were recovered from the scene. The remaining counts arose from an incident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728260 - 2023-11-14
, and six spent casings were recovered from the scene. The remaining counts arose from an incident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728260 - 2023-11-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258448 - 2020-04-22
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258448 - 2020-04-22
Kathleen J. Larson v. Arlita Furlong
it refused to grant a new trial based on newly discovered evidence and when it found the Larsons’ case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11384 - 2005-03-31
it refused to grant a new trial based on newly discovered evidence and when it found the Larsons’ case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11384 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Frederick N.
pretrial hearing, and warned the parties, including Mr. N., that they “must appear at every court case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5128 - 2017-09-19
pretrial hearing, and warned the parties, including Mr. N., that they “must appear at every court case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5128 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Frontsheet
2021 WI 46 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2020AP1007-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370296 - 2021-05-25
2021 WI 46 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2020AP1007-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370296 - 2021-05-25
COURT OF APPEALS
latest motions for DNA testing and other postconviction relief in eight cases that were handled together
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30817 - 2007-11-07
latest motions for DNA testing and other postconviction relief in eight cases that were handled together
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30817 - 2007-11-07
COURT OF APPEALS
decision varies from case to case. Id., ¶39. ¶9 “When the exercise of discretion has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48771 - 2010-04-12
decision varies from case to case. Id., ¶39. ¶9 “When the exercise of discretion has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48771 - 2010-04-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is not a subject of this appeal. 3 Cases appealed under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.107 “shall be given
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149118 - 2017-09-21
is not a subject of this appeal. 3 Cases appealed under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.107 “shall be given
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149118 - 2017-09-21