Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34791 - 34800 of 97638 for court records search online.
Search results 34791 - 34800 of 97638 for court records search online.
State v. Leonard J. LaRoche, Jr.
hearing appears in the appellate record. Thus the circuit court’s ruling from the bench on the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2294 - 2005-03-31
hearing appears in the appellate record. Thus the circuit court’s ruling from the bench on the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2294 - 2005-03-31
State v. Leonard J. LaRoche, Jr.
hearing appears in the appellate record. Thus the circuit court’s ruling from the bench on the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2295 - 2005-03-31
hearing appears in the appellate record. Thus the circuit court’s ruling from the bench on the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2295 - 2005-03-31
State v. James F. Karls
at 421. On the record before it, the supreme court determined “that a desire to delay the proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13728 - 2005-03-31
at 421. On the record before it, the supreme court determined “that a desire to delay the proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13728 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James F. Karls
also conclude that the present record is insufficient for us to determine, as the supreme court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13728 - 2014-09-15
also conclude that the present record is insufficient for us to determine, as the supreme court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13728 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court, as required, reviewed the terms of the plea bargain on the record at the time of Dillon’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87402 - 2014-09-15
court, as required, reviewed the terms of the plea bargain on the record at the time of Dillon’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87402 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 20, 2008 David R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32722 - 2014-09-15
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 20, 2008 David R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32722 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). The record establishes that Hall was afforded the opportunity to address the court prior to sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=225845 - 2018-10-30
). The record establishes that Hall was afforded the opportunity to address the court prior to sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=225845 - 2018-10-30
[PDF]
Daniel Khalar v. James Murphy
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED April 10, 1997 NOTICE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10161 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED April 10, 1997 NOTICE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10161 - 2017-09-19
Daniel Khalar v. James Murphy
is rendered the court does not decide a motion after verdict on the record or the judge, or the clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10161 - 2005-03-31
is rendered the court does not decide a motion after verdict on the record or the judge, or the clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10161 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Colleen M. Novak
the presence of the jury and Cristiana, Novak’s counsel advised the trial court about the tape recording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20128 - 2017-09-21
the presence of the jury and Cristiana, Novak’s counsel advised the trial court about the tape recording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20128 - 2017-09-21