Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3481 - 3490 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 3481 - 3490 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.
Werner W. Brandt v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
divorce from Melitta Brandt, because he and Melitta filed a joint return for 1979. An issue not raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12670 - 2005-03-31
divorce from Melitta Brandt, because he and Melitta filed a joint return for 1979. An issue not raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12670 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and the parties agreed to a joint sentencing recommendation. The no-merit report addresses whether Weston’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=400828 - 2021-07-29
and the parties agreed to a joint sentencing recommendation. The no-merit report addresses whether Weston’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=400828 - 2021-07-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
inmate, appeals from an order denying his motion for additional sentence credit. He argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105313 - 2017-09-21
inmate, appeals from an order denying his motion for additional sentence credit. He argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105313 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
STATE OF WISCONSIN
. Lonkoski’s Clear Request for a Lawyer When He Was Either Undergoing Custodial Interrogation or Facing
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/lonkoski.pdf - 2013-02-08
. Lonkoski’s Clear Request for a Lawyer When He Was Either Undergoing Custodial Interrogation or Facing
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/lonkoski.pdf - 2013-02-08
[PDF]
State v. Timothy P. Zoellick
of the stop, he was in custody and interrogated without having been Mirandized. 3 ¶8 At the motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6829 - 2017-09-20
of the stop, he was in custody and interrogated without having been Mirandized. 3 ¶8 At the motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6829 - 2017-09-20
State v. Timothy P. Zoellick
victims.” The trial court denied Zoellick’s motion to dismiss. ¶7 Prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6829 - 2005-03-31
victims.” The trial court denied Zoellick’s motion to dismiss. ¶7 Prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6829 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 11
a sanction of placement in nonsecure custody for 10 days. The court held a hearing on the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255408 - 2020-04-27
a sanction of placement in nonsecure custody for 10 days. The court held a hearing on the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255408 - 2020-04-27
[PDF]
WI APP 2
court No. 2014AP1767-CR 2 denied his motion to suppress evidence and permitted the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158329 - 2017-09-21
court No. 2014AP1767-CR 2 denied his motion to suppress evidence and permitted the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158329 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
summarily denying his motions for resentencing.1 The issues are whether the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29781 - 2014-09-15
summarily denying his motions for resentencing.1 The issues are whether the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29781 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motions for resentencing.[1] The issues are whether the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29781 - 2007-07-23
denying his motions for resentencing.[1] The issues are whether the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29781 - 2007-07-23