Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3481 - 3490 of 63485 for records.
Search results 3481 - 3490 of 63485 for records.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95889 - 2014-09-15
report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95889 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, was advised of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187485 - 2017-09-21
, was advised of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187485 - 2017-09-21
Darryl M. Bunker v. David H. Schwarz
not properly record the chain of custody, and did not honor his request for retesting. Consequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6977 - 2005-03-31
not properly record the chain of custody, and did not honor his request for retesting. Consequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6977 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103043 - 2013-10-14
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103043 - 2013-10-14
State v. Kenneth Garrigan
in prison. This appeal ensued. The record contains no sentence modification or reconsideration motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14183 - 2005-03-31
in prison. This appeal ensued. The record contains no sentence modification or reconsideration motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14183 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100090 - 2017-09-21
2 not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100090 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
, was advised of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100090 - 2013-07-30
, was advised of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100090 - 2013-07-30
CA Blank Order
a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127874 - 2006-08-14
a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127874 - 2006-08-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in camera review of the victim’s counseling records. He also argues he received ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=517577 - 2022-05-11
in camera review of the victim’s counseling records. He also argues he received ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=517577 - 2022-05-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, but this finding is contradicted by the record. Specifically, Van Rossum testified that, under Capitoland’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=488149 - 2022-02-24
, but this finding is contradicted by the record. Specifically, Van Rossum testified that, under Capitoland’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=488149 - 2022-02-24