Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34801 - 34810 of 63197 for records.
Search results 34801 - 34810 of 63197 for records.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
records. Maldonado did not have personal knowledge of when or by whom the endorsement was made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242057 - 2019-06-13
records. Maldonado did not have personal knowledge of when or by whom the endorsement was made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242057 - 2019-06-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
of a violation of WIS. STAT. § 948.02, there is no evidence in the record that he committed the crime by use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28323 - 2014-09-15
of a violation of WIS. STAT. § 948.02, there is no evidence in the record that he committed the crime by use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28323 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judge[,]” because he did not “need a public defender with him.” After a “[d]iscussion off the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76219 - 2014-09-15
judge[,]” because he did not “need a public defender with him.” After a “[d]iscussion off the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76219 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Ashanti D.
” throughout the record. On remittitur we direct the clerk of courts to determine the correct spelling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10355 - 2017-09-20
” throughout the record. On remittitur we direct the clerk of courts to determine the correct spelling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10355 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
to Patterson.” ¶16 The record, however, reflects that the sentencing court considered evidence regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92338 - 2013-01-30
to Patterson.” ¶16 The record, however, reflects that the sentencing court considered evidence regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92338 - 2013-01-30
COURT OF APPEALS
for the defendant. And [the trial court] think[s] based upon the evidence in the record, including the statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35938 - 2009-03-23
for the defendant. And [the trial court] think[s] based upon the evidence in the record, including the statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35938 - 2009-03-23
COURT OF APPEALS
to the approved design. The record contains no dispute that the roadway was constructed according to the design
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49918 - 2010-05-10
to the approved design. The record contains no dispute that the roadway was constructed according to the design
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49918 - 2010-05-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
is not supported by citation to authority or the record. However, Van Handel does not dispute the Department’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33493 - 2014-09-15
is not supported by citation to authority or the record. However, Van Handel does not dispute the Department’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33493 - 2014-09-15
State v. Robert W. Wodenjak
, we note that the record is unclear as to whether Wodenjak made this inquiry before or during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3401 - 2005-03-31
, we note that the record is unclear as to whether Wodenjak made this inquiry before or during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3401 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert Gordon
the judgments were purportedly entered on Gordon's guilty plea, the record reveals that he did not, in fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8670 - 2005-03-31
the judgments were purportedly entered on Gordon's guilty plea, the record reveals that he did not, in fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8670 - 2005-03-31