Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34811 - 34820 of 97621 for court records search online.
Search results 34811 - 34820 of 97621 for court records search online.
[PDF]
NOTICE
also argues the court lacked jurisdiction because the record had already been transmitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30228 - 2014-09-15
also argues the court lacked jurisdiction because the record had already been transmitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30228 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
the trial court’s specifically stating on the record that it was “stay[ing] any finding of contempt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32736 - 2014-09-15
the trial court’s specifically stating on the record that it was “stay[ing] any finding of contempt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32736 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kelly Scott Roberts
was lacking because of her other cases. The trial court, however, determined that the record did not support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8228 - 2005-03-31
was lacking because of her other cases. The trial court, however, determined that the record did not support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8228 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
himself in his circuit court proceedings. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=308267 - 2020-11-25
himself in his circuit court proceedings. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=308267 - 2020-11-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is limited to the record before the circuit court in reaching its decision. Morris’ motion to this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74543 - 2014-09-15
is limited to the record before the circuit court in reaching its decision. Morris’ motion to this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74543 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
identified those portions of the record where the sentencing court considered the seriousness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76100 - 2014-09-15
identified those portions of the record where the sentencing court considered the seriousness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76100 - 2014-09-15
State v. Anthony Kane
influence over him. The court found that both of these claims lacked support in the record. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15092 - 2005-03-31
influence over him. The court found that both of these claims lacked support in the record. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15092 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eureka Scruggs
and that Scruggs continued to sell the drugs even after the murder. The record also shows that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11998 - 2005-03-31
and that Scruggs continued to sell the drugs even after the murder. The record also shows that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11998 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Eureka Scruggs
to sell the drugs even after the murder. The record also shows that the trial court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11998 - 2017-09-21
to sell the drugs even after the murder. The record also shows that the trial court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11998 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
his plea. Moore alleged that the court failed to establish on the record that he fully understood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35586 - 2014-09-15
his plea. Moore alleged that the court failed to establish on the record that he fully understood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35586 - 2014-09-15

