Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34821 - 34830 of 83322 for case search.
Search results 34821 - 34830 of 83322 for case search.
State v. Brady B.
in this case because the issue “goes to the very power of the State as it addresses the State’s power to charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14191 - 2005-03-31
in this case because the issue “goes to the very power of the State as it addresses the State’s power to charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14191 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be allowed to withdraw his guilty pleas based on newly discovered evidence. We conclude that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=600028 - 2022-12-13
be allowed to withdraw his guilty pleas based on newly discovered evidence. We conclude that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=600028 - 2022-12-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
entered a guilty plea to a misdemeanor charge of obstructing an officer in Brown County case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=498428 - 2022-03-22
entered a guilty plea to a misdemeanor charge of obstructing an officer in Brown County case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=498428 - 2022-03-22
COURT OF APPEALS
agreed to handle Mr. Madden’s case after the co-defendants, and that’s based on Mr. Madden’s degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66201 - 2011-06-20
agreed to handle Mr. Madden’s case after the co-defendants, and that’s based on Mr. Madden’s degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66201 - 2011-06-20
Benny J. Bridges v. Thomas Karlen
County convicted Bridges on six burglary counts, in case number 87-CF-19. On counts 2 and 3, Bridges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17834 - 2005-05-02
County convicted Bridges on six burglary counts, in case number 87-CF-19. On counts 2 and 3, Bridges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17834 - 2005-05-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159819 - 2017-09-21
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159819 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Benny J. Bridges v. Thomas Karlen
Bridges on six burglary counts, in case number 87-CF-19. On counts 2 and 3, Bridges received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17834 - 2017-09-21
Bridges on six burglary counts, in case number 87-CF-19. On counts 2 and 3, Bridges received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17834 - 2017-09-21
State v. Timothy R. Pamonicutt
penalties, the judgment and order are affirmed. The procedure in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10513 - 2005-03-31
penalties, the judgment and order are affirmed. The procedure in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10513 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Judy Patricia Bushmaker v. Green Bay Diocese of The Roman Catholic Church
wrongly, during a civil lawsuit, referred to Witczak’s no contest pleas in the criminal case; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11508 - 2017-09-19
wrongly, during a civil lawsuit, referred to Witczak’s no contest pleas in the criminal case; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11508 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Alphonso Miller
in Carprue is determinative of this case, and leads us to reject Miller’s claim. The supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17945 - 2017-09-21
in Carprue is determinative of this case, and leads us to reject Miller’s claim. The supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17945 - 2017-09-21