Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34821 - 34830 of 58547 for speedy trial.

[PDF] Converse and Lovina Smith v. Wisconsin Institute for Torah Study, Inc.
residences. The trial court concluded that the board's interpretation of the MILWAUKEE, WIS., BUILDING
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11552 - 2017-09-19

Robert Wagoner v. City of Milwaukee
. The Estate of Robert Wagoner appeals from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment to the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3690 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
construe Fitzpatrick’s complaint as a claim that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to pursue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99433 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Nakia N. Hayes
to the authority of the warrant, Hayes was searched. The police discovered cocaine on his person. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8280 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Joseph A. Kayon
. Kayon argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its No. 01-2365-CR 2 discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4350 - 2017-09-19

State v. Ruven Seibert
., appeals from the trial court's order denying his petition for supervised release.[1] The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12970 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
,” the State breached the plea agreement at sentencing, and he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48820 - 2010-04-07

[PDF] State v. Ruven Seibert
was previously committed as a sexual predator under ch. 980, STATS., appeals from the trial court's order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12970 - 2017-09-21

Samuel Bonanno v. Lewis Borsellino
judgment, the trial court found that the access strip was owned in fee simple by Borsellino
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8762 - 2005-03-31

Scott Development Company, L.L.C. v. State of Wisconsin-Department of Transportation
that sum at 5% interest. Scott argues that (1) it is entitled to a new trial because the jury verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15949 - 2005-03-31