Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34821 - 34830 of 38282 for t's.

State v. Sylvester J. Sasnett, Jr.
, 769 (1987). In reviewing this decision, “[t]he question on appeal is not whether this court ... would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8326 - 2005-03-31

State v. Antonio L. Simmons
], and I think it is important that there be a strong deterrent message se[n]t by the sentences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6541 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
on this issue. ¶32 “[T]here is no bad faith when the police negligently fail to preserve evidence which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87315 - 2012-09-19

State v. John F. Goralski
needed to prove that the beverage sold was beer, Black writes: [T]he preponderance of authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3187 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
will not be overturned unless clearly erroneous. Id. However, “[t]he ultimate determination[s] of whether counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102152 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Linda Griffin v. Milwaukee Transport Services, Inc.
. The “rational basis” test was defined in McGowan v. Maryland, 366 U.S. 420 (1961): [T]he Fourteenth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2437 - 2017-09-19

97 CV 3190 Dale Jackson v. Employe Trust Funds Board
is twenty days, “[t]he state or an agency of the state or an officer, employe or agent of the state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14693 - 2005-03-31

State v. Sylvester Townsend
material. He argues that “[t]his destroyed evidence by the detective was crucial material … and should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18515 - 2005-06-13

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, V. A. T
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=934263 - 2025-04-02

WI App 78 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP334 Complete Title of ...
N.W.2d 744 (1999) (“[T]he inclusion of one sufficient and adequately investigated claim does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83843 - 2012-07-26