Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34831 - 34840 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 34831 - 34840 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Cleophus Amerson
motion for a new trial, and because the manner in which trial counsel conducted Amerson's defense did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9791 - 2005-03-31
motion for a new trial, and because the manner in which trial counsel conducted Amerson's defense did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9791 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the no-merit report. By order dated March 13, 2015, this court granted her motion to withdraw because she
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142995 - 2017-09-21
the no-merit report. By order dated March 13, 2015, this court granted her motion to withdraw because she
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142995 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
CURIAM. Kaleb Ross, pro se, appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=563647 - 2022-09-07
CURIAM. Kaleb Ross, pro se, appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=563647 - 2022-09-07
Anthony L. Alsum v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
order granting the Wisconsin Department of Transportation’s (DOT) motion to dismiss and motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6915 - 2005-03-31
order granting the Wisconsin Department of Transportation’s (DOT) motion to dismiss and motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6915 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. appeals the denial of her post‑dispositional motion, brought pursuant to Wis. Stat. §§ 48.46 and 806.07
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134598 - 2015-02-09
. appeals the denial of her post‑dispositional motion, brought pursuant to Wis. Stat. §§ 48.46 and 806.07
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134598 - 2015-02-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to raise this issue by failing to make a post-trial motion asserting the alleged error. We elect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84177 - 2014-09-15
to raise this issue by failing to make a post-trial motion asserting the alleged error. We elect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84177 - 2014-09-15
State v. Trammel V. Johnson
, and 943.32(2) (1999–2000).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5528 - 2005-03-31
, and 943.32(2) (1999–2000).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5528 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
and in violation of the temporary order. ¶3 Following a hearing on Anuradha’s motion, the court ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34126 - 2014-09-15
and in violation of the temporary order. ¶3 Following a hearing on Anuradha’s motion, the court ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34126 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Richard D. Martin
conviction, contending that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence. Martin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3231 - 2017-09-19
conviction, contending that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence. Martin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3231 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
that these allegations, if believed by a jury, amount to entrapment. But the trial court granted the State’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37590 - 2009-07-14
that these allegations, if believed by a jury, amount to entrapment. But the trial court granted the State’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37590 - 2009-07-14