Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34841 - 34850 of 66165 for e j.
Search results 34841 - 34850 of 66165 for e j.
State v. Claude Lowery
by Lowery’s contentions. In reviewing a sufficiency of the evidence claim: [W]e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11834 - 2012-10-25
by Lowery’s contentions. In reviewing a sufficiency of the evidence claim: [W]e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11834 - 2012-10-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement the court could have imposed. See WIS. STAT. §§ 961.41(1)(a), (cm)1g., and 939.50(3)(e), (g
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=641009 - 2023-04-04
confinement the court could have imposed. See WIS. STAT. §§ 961.41(1)(a), (cm)1g., and 939.50(3)(e), (g
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=641009 - 2023-04-04
COURT OF APPEALS
: Kevin E. Martens, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J., Kessler and Brennan, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95161 - 2013-04-08
: Kevin E. Martens, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J., Kessler and Brennan, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95161 - 2013-04-08
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Dane County: stephen e. ehlke, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, P.J.[1] Steven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91376 - 2013-01-09
of the circuit court for Dane County: stephen e. ehlke, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, P.J.[1] Steven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91376 - 2013-01-09
State v. Olton Lee Dumas
court for Rock County: james e. welker and EDWIN C. DAHLBERG, Judges. Affirmed. Before Eich
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12649 - 2005-03-31
court for Rock County: james e. welker and EDWIN C. DAHLBERG, Judges. Affirmed. Before Eich
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12649 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that “[w]e ignore the request to dismiss ‘without prejudice.’” Stephens did not petition for review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989608 - 2025-07-30
that “[w]e ignore the request to dismiss ‘without prejudice.’” Stephens did not petition for review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989608 - 2025-07-30
Secura Insurance v. Margaret A. Schuirmann
. § 806.07. Under Wis. Stat. § 809.19(1)(e), proper appellate argument requires an argument containing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2129 - 2005-03-31
. § 806.07. Under Wis. Stat. § 809.19(1)(e), proper appellate argument requires an argument containing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2129 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
from Thomas: “[W]e have noted that if a circuit court ‘fails to establish a factual basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27527 - 2014-09-15
from Thomas: “[W]e have noted that if a circuit court ‘fails to establish a factual basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27527 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for. …. In terms of Mr. Brown’s testimony, I think he—[h]e testified largely truthfully, but also selectively…. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85491 - 2014-09-15
for. …. In terms of Mr. Brown’s testimony, I think he—[h]e testified largely truthfully, but also selectively…. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85491 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2006AP662 Cir. Ct. No. 2004CV341
. § 19.82(1).2 The public records law provides that “[e]xcept as otherwise provided by law, any
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28343 - 2014-09-15
. § 19.82(1).2 The public records law provides that “[e]xcept as otherwise provided by law, any
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28343 - 2014-09-15