Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34851 - 34860 of 73716 for ha.
Search results 34851 - 34860 of 73716 for ha.
State v. Gregg R. Madden
whether a defendant has shown a fair and just reason for withdrawal: (1) an assertion of innocence; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14093 - 2005-03-31
whether a defendant has shown a fair and just reason for withdrawal: (1) an assertion of innocence; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14093 - 2005-03-31
State v. Karl H. Amenson
307, 312, 395 N.W.2d 795 (Ct. App. 1986). Amenson has the burden of proving by clear and convincing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5381 - 2005-03-31
307, 312, 395 N.W.2d 795 (Ct. App. 1986). Amenson has the burden of proving by clear and convincing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5381 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 23, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
circumstances, a trial court has the authority to modify a sentence even though no new factor is presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99700 - 2013-07-22
circumstances, a trial court has the authority to modify a sentence even though no new factor is presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99700 - 2013-07-22
COURT OF APPEALS
of action has not started because of it lacking, “provided service of an authenticated copy of the summons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87238 - 2012-09-17
of action has not started because of it lacking, “provided service of an authenticated copy of the summons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87238 - 2012-09-17
State v. Jose Soto
prior to sentencing when the defendant has shown a “fair and just reason” for withdrawal. Id. at 128
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14353 - 2005-03-31
prior to sentencing when the defendant has shown a “fair and just reason” for withdrawal. Id. at 128
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14353 - 2005-03-31
State v. Donald Kaltenbach
, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has the burden of persuasion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3020 - 2005-03-31
, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has the burden of persuasion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3020 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Elyse Joransen-Hamilton Knutson v. Richard C. Knutson
.2d 175 (1982). ¶7 Our supreme court has determined that an agreement is inequitable under WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2790 - 2017-09-19
.2d 175 (1982). ¶7 Our supreme court has determined that an agreement is inequitable under WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2790 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Xavier Lorenzo Brown
, [Brown] has failed to establish ... that Love's record constitutes a new factor for purposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9491 - 2017-09-19
, [Brown] has failed to establish ... that Love's record constitutes a new factor for purposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9491 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 2019AP945-CR State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=461543 - 2021-12-15
notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 2019AP945-CR State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=461543 - 2021-12-15
State v. James R. Boardman
will consider de novo whether the circuit court has erred in the application of law to undisputed facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13084 - 2005-03-31
will consider de novo whether the circuit court has erred in the application of law to undisputed facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13084 - 2005-03-31