Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34851 - 34860 of 65155 for or b.
Search results 34851 - 34860 of 65155 for or b.
COURT OF APPEALS
of a child under the age of twelve, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 948.02(1)(b), and child enticement, contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103044 - 2013-10-14
of a child under the age of twelve, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 948.02(1)(b), and child enticement, contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103044 - 2013-10-14
COURT OF APPEALS
are a 100-foot pierhead line and a twelve-and-a-half-foot setback from the riparian rights line. §§13.11(B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50740 - 2010-06-08
are a 100-foot pierhead line and a twelve-and-a-half-foot setback from the riparian rights line. §§13.11(B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50740 - 2010-06-08
[PDF]
Bank One Wisconsin v. Robert H. Kahl
, or excusable neglect; (b) Newly-discovered evidence which entitles a party to a new trial under s. 805.15(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5090 - 2017-09-19
, or excusable neglect; (b) Newly-discovered evidence which entitles a party to a new trial under s. 805.15(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5090 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the officer’s or employee’s office or employment to take another into custody.” § 946.41(2)(b). ¶11 Thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53818 - 2014-09-15
of the officer’s or employee’s office or employment to take another into custody.” § 946.41(2)(b). ¶11 Thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53818 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Jerry M. v. Dennis L. M.
adoption after termination. (b) The age and health of the child, both at the time of the disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8491 - 2017-09-19
adoption after termination. (b) The age and health of the child, both at the time of the disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8491 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
Tingo’s testimony was admissible, counsel was not deficient for failing to object to it. B. Failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33845 - 2014-09-15
Tingo’s testimony was admissible, counsel was not deficient for failing to object to it. B. Failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33845 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Angela M.W.
and the potential dispositions. (b) Establish whether any promises or threats were made to elicit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13568 - 2017-09-21
and the potential dispositions. (b) Establish whether any promises or threats were made to elicit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13568 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that is in the actual or constructive possession of a government agency. See WIS. STAT. § 974.07(2)(b). Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79678 - 2014-09-15
that is in the actual or constructive possession of a government agency. See WIS. STAT. § 974.07(2)(b). Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79678 - 2014-09-15
State v. Scott G. Waddell
was convicted and any read-in crime.” “Read-in crime” is defined in § 973.20(1g)(b) as “any crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16165 - 2005-03-31
was convicted and any read-in crime.” “Read-in crime” is defined in § 973.20(1g)(b) as “any crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16165 - 2005-03-31
State v. George Reed
not warrant a new trial. B. Ineffective Assistance. Next, Reed claims he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13073 - 2005-03-31
not warrant a new trial. B. Ineffective Assistance. Next, Reed claims he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13073 - 2005-03-31