Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34881 - 34890 of 63198 for records.
Search results 34881 - 34890 of 63198 for records.
COURT OF APPEALS
were on is evident on the video recording of the stop. The video depicts two vehicles other than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40563 - 2009-09-08
were on is evident on the video recording of the stop. The video depicts two vehicles other than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40563 - 2009-09-08
COURT OF APPEALS
guns to him. The parties agree that there is no evidence in the record before us that the guns were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64139 - 2011-05-16
guns to him. The parties agree that there is no evidence in the record before us that the guns were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64139 - 2011-05-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of No. 2018AP1937-CR 2 the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250990 - 2019-12-11
upon our review of No. 2018AP1937-CR 2 the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250990 - 2019-12-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
unknowingly overlooked them. See id., ¶40. The record here reveals that this is not the case. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106694 - 2017-09-21
unknowingly overlooked them. See id., ¶40. The record here reveals that this is not the case. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106694 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
2 Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=994592 - 2025-08-13
2 Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=994592 - 2025-08-13
State v. John G. Anderson
to testify at trial is premised on a factual assertion that is not supported by the record. The record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16301 - 2005-03-31
to testify at trial is premised on a factual assertion that is not supported by the record. The record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16301 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eugene Nichols
that he is a Muslim. It is clear from the record that the evidence was admitted because it was relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14094 - 2005-03-31
that he is a Muslim. It is clear from the record that the evidence was admitted because it was relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14094 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
No. 2022AP1323-CR 2 and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=730325 - 2023-11-21
No. 2022AP1323-CR 2 and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=730325 - 2023-11-21
COURT OF APPEALS
provided the text of the relevant portion of his recorded interview by Guy. The State responds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91909 - 2013-01-22
provided the text of the relevant portion of his recorded interview by Guy. The State responds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91909 - 2013-01-22
State v. Daniel H. Frasch
finds substantial reason not to do so and states the reason on the record." The reference to "any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10271 - 2005-03-31
finds substantial reason not to do so and states the reason on the record." The reference to "any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10271 - 2005-03-31