Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34891 - 34900 of 46056 for paternity test paper work.

[PDF] Appeal No. 2006AP2388-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2005CF681
be subject to a “reasonableness” test. He points out that the officer admitted that he had seldom, if ever
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29909 - 2014-09-15

State v. Quinton K. Washington
, Washington must show that the two-pronged test set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10844 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
morning hours of August 31, 2008, when he struck and killed a pedestrian. A test of Ruderman’s blood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113094 - 2014-05-27

State v. James R. Sieger
test requires the defendant to show that counsel’s performance was deficient—that counsel made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12702 - 2005-03-31

Barbara Melone v. State
was posted, Christopher failed a urinalysis test. ¶3 At a hearing on the bond forfeiture, Melone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2479 - 2005-03-31

State v. David E. Bowers
to correct a manifest injustice; the “manifest injustice” test is met if the defendant was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4310 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Veronica J.
., ¶41. In reaching this conclusion, the court assessed the three-factor test: “the private interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20687 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] John O. Shaline v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
. American Employers Ins. Co., 119 Wis. 2d 722, 735-36, 351 N.W.2d 156 (1984). The test is not what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3728 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. 1 (1968)) (footnote omitted). The applicable No. 2015AP1977-CR 6 test is objective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185129 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Davon D. McVicker
. If there is corroboration of any significant fact, that is sufficient under the Wisconsin test. State v. Holt, 17 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19891 - 2017-09-21