Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3491 - 3500 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.

[MS WORD] GF-177: Declaration to Seal Identifying Information in a Child Custody Proceeding
of the respondent. Affidavit to Seal Identifying Information in a Child Custody Proceeding Case
/formdisplay/GF-177.doc?formNumber=GF-177&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2024-07-26

[MS WORD] GF-178: Disclosure of Sealed Identifying Information in a Child Custody Proceeding
and Disclosure of Sealed Identifying Information in a Child Custody Proceeding Case No. Enter the name
/formdisplay/GF-178.doc?formNumber=GF-178&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-03-04

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for a January 11, 2016 hearing on Wells Fargo’s motion for default judgment. Lisa did not appeal the decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207735 - 2018-01-30

COURT OF APPEALS
court applied the wrong burden of proof when resolving Cole’s motion to suppress his custodial statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57655 - 2010-12-13

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2013AP150 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Betty Jerusalem, pro se, appeals an order denying motions that attempt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110256 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
., Mangerson and Stark, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Betty Jerusalem, pro se, appeals an order denying motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110256 - 2014-04-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Christopher Devenport’s motion to suppress incriminating statements that he made No. 2023AP1234-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804924 - 2024-05-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
claims the court erred in denying his suppression motion and in permitting certain expert testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245387 - 2019-08-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of conviction did not grant any sentence credit, and Brown filed two pro se sentence credit motions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139003 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
credit motions in this case seeking 581 days of credit. In response to Brown’s pro se motions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139003 - 2015-04-07