Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3491 - 3500 of 6741 for mix.

[PDF] Taylor Investment Corporation of Wisconsin v. PLL Marquette, LLC
. § 814.025(3)(b) presents a mixed question of fact and law. Stern v. Thompson & Coates, Ltd., 185 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4404 - 2017-09-19

State v. Willy J. Love
ineffective-assistance-of-counsel is a mixed question of law and fact. See Johnson, 133 Wis. 2d at 216, 395
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16164 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
sufficient facts entitling him to a hearing is subject to a mixed standard of review. See State v. Allen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70312 - 2011-08-29

COURT OF APPEALS
is sufficient to sustain the circuit court’s findings. We review these issues under a mixed standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56628 - 2010-11-15

[PDF] State v. Michael S. Kazanjian
(1987). Whether counsel’s performance was ineffective is a mixed question of fact and law. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15484 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Jerome E. Buie
. The issues of performance and prejudice present mixed questions of fact and law. See Sanchez, 201 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26057 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Wisconsin State Telephone Association v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
that requirement. STANDARD OF REVIEW Our standard of review is mixed. We owe no deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7778 - 2017-09-19

State v. Richard P. Gilliland
. at 690. Ineffective assistance of counsel is a mixed question of law and fact. See Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25917 - 2006-08-29

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
conceivable. Id. at 693. Ineffective assistance claims present mixed questions of fact and law. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=335496 - 2021-02-17

COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of counsel under a mixed standard of review. State v. Manuel, 2005 WI 75, ¶26, 281 Wis. 2d 554
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100565 - 2013-08-07