Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3491 - 3500 of 63187 for records.
Search results 3491 - 3500 of 63187 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213862 - 2018-06-06
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213862 - 2018-06-06
Winnebago County v. Paul M. Nigl
record; second, if we were to construe his petition as a direct appeal, he is not entitled to relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6651 - 2005-03-31
record; second, if we were to construe his petition as a direct appeal, he is not entitled to relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6651 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
, and has responded. We have independently reviewed the Record, the response, and the no-merit report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000743 - 2025-08-27
, and has responded. We have independently reviewed the Record, the response, and the no-merit report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000743 - 2025-08-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and the record on appeal is unclear regarding credit for the deposit. We therefore reverse and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196604 - 2017-09-21
, and the record on appeal is unclear regarding credit for the deposit. We therefore reverse and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196604 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
conviction. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138093 - 2015-03-23
conviction. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138093 - 2015-03-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201344 - 2017-11-07
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201344 - 2017-11-07
State v. James D.B.
because nothing in the record indicates that James has any income or assets other than his SSI benefits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15914 - 2005-03-31
because nothing in the record indicates that James has any income or assets other than his SSI benefits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15914 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140093 - 2015-04-20
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140093 - 2015-04-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record, the no-merit report, the response, and the supplemental report, as mandated by Anders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745628 - 2023-12-28
the record, the no-merit report, the response, and the supplemental report, as mandated by Anders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745628 - 2023-12-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with the State’s recommendation. This no-merit appeal follows. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111964 - 2017-09-21
with the State’s recommendation. This no-merit appeal follows. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111964 - 2017-09-21