Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3491 - 3500 of 6188 for sheriff.
Search results 3491 - 3500 of 6188 for sheriff.
State v. Glenn R. Reetz
. Two police officers testified at the suppression hearing. The first, Marquette County Deputy Sheriff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11106 - 2005-03-31
. Two police officers testified at the suppression hearing. The first, Marquette County Deputy Sheriff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11106 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David M. Meza
Sheriff’s Department. Meza was subsequently charged with the crimes listed above. ¶4 The United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2537 - 2017-09-19
Sheriff’s Department. Meza was subsequently charged with the crimes listed above. ¶4 The United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2537 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
contempt issues and remanded him to the custody of the sheriff.3 ¶5 On appeal, Richard challenges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82398 - 2014-09-15
contempt issues and remanded him to the custody of the sheriff.3 ¶5 On appeal, Richard challenges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82398 - 2014-09-15
State v. Arthur Foster
, the Pierce County Sheriff's Department arrested Foster and transported him to the jail for questioning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10019 - 2005-03-31
, the Pierce County Sheriff's Department arrested Foster and transported him to the jail for questioning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10019 - 2005-03-31
2011 WI APP 34
that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion by failing to consider factors beyond the sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59566 - 2011-03-29
that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion by failing to consider factors beyond the sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59566 - 2011-03-29
COURT OF APPEALS
the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶2 Deputy Edward McKillip of the Bayfield County Sheriff’s Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35353 - 2009-01-26
the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶2 Deputy Edward McKillip of the Bayfield County Sheriff’s Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35353 - 2009-01-26
County of Dane v. Steven Spring
are not disputed. Officer Paul Miller of the Dane County Sheriff's Department was dispatched to a motorcycle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10738 - 2005-03-31
are not disputed. Officer Paul Miller of the Dane County Sheriff's Department was dispatched to a motorcycle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10738 - 2005-03-31
State v. Timothy Zeilinger
Sheriff’s Department both monitored a dispatch call reporting suspicious activity on State Highway 35
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6104 - 2005-03-31
Sheriff’s Department both monitored a dispatch call reporting suspicious activity on State Highway 35
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6104 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ryan E. Brockman
On October 15, 1994, at 12:08 a.m., Dane County sheriff's deputy Randall P. Wiessinger saw a vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9283 - 2017-09-19
On October 15, 1994, at 12:08 a.m., Dane County sheriff's deputy Randall P. Wiessinger saw a vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9283 - 2017-09-19
State v. David J. Fury
affirm. FACTS On the evening of March 10, 1995, Deputy Sheriff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9958 - 2005-03-31
affirm. FACTS On the evening of March 10, 1995, Deputy Sheriff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9958 - 2005-03-31