Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34911 - 34920 of 69007 for had.

[PDF] State v. Robert J. Rozell
was not operating in a vacuum at the post-revocation sentencing hearing. Rozell had appeared before the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4034 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Marva Harris v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
of subject matter jurisdiction. Harris contends the circuit court erred when it ruled her complaint had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14730 - 2017-09-21

State v. Patrick A. Hayden
and the potential penalties. The court reviewed the plea questionnaire that Hayden had completed. Hayden indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8395 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Michael A. Carbine
county; August 12, 1994, in Milwaukee county; and November 23, 1996, in Trempealeau county. He had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2946 - 2017-09-19

State v. Michael J. Cauley
the bankruptcy court had made a determination that they had not engaged in fraudulent practices. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8509 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
. The court stated that Kenneth had previously moved into periods of self-employment during the marriage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44902 - 2014-09-15

County of Jefferson v. Michael V. Hendricks
of the hearing and because Hendricks had no right to counsel in a prosecution for violating a traffic regulation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2178 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Robert W. Ganley
this, and therefore failed to follow the Department’s own rules. However, the trial court found that Ganley had
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12439 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Ue Thao
that day and the roads were icy. Gish had just entered Interstate 94 in Hudson and was traveling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7636 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
, and the fact that the state had a constitutional duty to provide the plaintiff with medical treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35192 - 2014-09-15