Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34921 - 34930 of 58937 for SMALL CLAIMS.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that Lafayette was not eligible for the substance abuse program. Lafayette also claimed he was entitled
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218700 - 2018-09-11

State v. Anthony Harris
), 161.01(14), Stats., and of carrying a concealed weapon, see § 941.23, Stats. He claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9175 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
a postdisposition motion claiming defense counsel provided ineffective assistance for, among other things, failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45696 - 2010-01-11

[PDF] State v. Mylea Wirkus
earlier, a claim that the police failed to exercise reasonable diligence in providing a suspect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21671 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, Airola cites portions of the record taken from the CHIPS cases to support his claims of physical abuse
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=898488 - 2025-01-09

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
presented the check to Dr. Krausen who cashed it. Anchor Bank claimed that it suffered a loss of $5380.72
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114653 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
meritorious claim for plea withdrawal on the ground that his guilty pleas were not knowing, intelligent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=331814 - 2021-02-09

Spencer G. Breitreiter v. Clifton Gunderson & Company
expert testimony was necessary for proof of Breitreiter’s claim. We sustain the sanction imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10898 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael G. Kachelski
. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Kachelski claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12448 - 2005-03-31

Deborah Martin-Semrow v. Marc Raymond Semrow
, that statement, unaccompanied by any evidence of record, is insufficient to establish the firm’s claim to funds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13612 - 2005-03-31