Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34921 - 34930 of 69479 for as he.
Search results 34921 - 34930 of 69479 for as he.
[PDF]
State v. Eric C. Hilson
motion. He claims he was denied effective assistance of counsel when his attorney failed to object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4194 - 2017-09-19
motion. He claims he was denied effective assistance of counsel when his attorney failed to object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4194 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
that, as a result, his employment contract should be considered to have been automatically renewed, and he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48114 - 2010-03-17
that, as a result, his employment contract should be considered to have been automatically renewed, and he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48114 - 2010-03-17
State v. Charles L. Klaeser
(OWI).[1] He contends that the trial court should have suppressed evidence of a chemical test because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12234 - 2005-03-31
(OWI).[1] He contends that the trial court should have suppressed evidence of a chemical test because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12234 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
long period of time, but he did follow and watch the car deviate twice within a very short distance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30593 - 2007-10-15
long period of time, but he did follow and watch the car deviate twice within a very short distance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30593 - 2007-10-15
State v. Lamont Williams
was convicted by a jury of multiple counts of armed robbery. He was sentenced in February 1994. At the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7630 - 2005-03-31
was convicted by a jury of multiple counts of armed robbery. He was sentenced in February 1994. At the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7630 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the no-merit report, he argues that the evidence was insufficient to support one of the elements of the first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699566 - 2023-09-06
to the no-merit report, he argues that the evidence was insufficient to support one of the elements of the first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699566 - 2023-09-06
COURT OF APPEALS
At the time of Duncan’s sentencing, the sentencing court was required to find whether he was eligible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115583 - 2014-06-30
At the time of Duncan’s sentencing, the sentencing court was required to find whether he was eligible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115583 - 2014-06-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 974.06. In the first motion, he argued that his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188195 - 2017-09-21
pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 974.06. In the first motion, he argued that his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188195 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Thomas C. Nelson
the appeal process after entry of either of these judgments of conviction. Therefore, he has no right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10289 - 2017-09-20
the appeal process after entry of either of these judgments of conviction. Therefore, he has no right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10289 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
at the hearing to what he describes as thirty-five minutes, which resulted in him not receiving an opportunity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55384 - 2010-10-13
at the hearing to what he describes as thirty-five minutes, which resulted in him not receiving an opportunity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55384 - 2010-10-13