Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34931 - 34940 of 82649 for case codes/1000.
Search results 34931 - 34940 of 82649 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
James W. Parlow v. Wisconsin Retirement Board
. No. 2004AP2580 2 ¶2 The facts and procedural history of this case are lengthy and familiar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19702 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2004AP2580 2 ¶2 The facts and procedural history of this case are lengthy and familiar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19702 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Mario F. Blasnig
April 16, 1996, this court granted Blasnig's motion to consolidate cases numbered 96-0165-CR (appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10262 - 2017-09-20
April 16, 1996, this court granted Blasnig's motion to consolidate cases numbered 96-0165-CR (appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10262 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146987 - 2017-09-21
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146987 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
of procedures for original action cases involving state legislative redistricting FILED JAN 4, 2008
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31397 - 2014-09-15
of procedures for original action cases involving state legislative redistricting FILED JAN 4, 2008
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31397 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by five years’ extended supervision, consecutive to a revocation sentence in another case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783892 - 2024-04-02
by five years’ extended supervision, consecutive to a revocation sentence in another case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783892 - 2024-04-02
[PDF]
State v. Mikkel J. Goff
the deference we normally award evidentiary rulings. Id. at 399. In the present case the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4169 - 2017-09-20
the deference we normally award evidentiary rulings. Id. at 399. In the present case the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4169 - 2017-09-20
State v. Timothy D. Lewis
). There is no exception to this privilege in criminal sentencing proceedings, or in this type of criminal case. See Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4118 - 2013-01-09
). There is no exception to this privilege in criminal sentencing proceedings, or in this type of criminal case. See Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4118 - 2013-01-09
State v. Edward C. Brandau
. There is no mechanism by which Wisconsin could compel Iowa to give Wisconsin priority over Kentucky's cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10141 - 2005-03-31
. There is no mechanism by which Wisconsin could compel Iowa to give Wisconsin priority over Kentucky's cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10141 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mario F. Blasnig
-sentencing in this case, constitute a new factor justifying reduction of his sentence. In essence, he argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10263 - 2015-07-21
-sentencing in this case, constitute a new factor justifying reduction of his sentence. In essence, he argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10263 - 2015-07-21
Julie Ann Coyle v. Patrick Joseph Coyle
days of the entry of the December judgment, at the latest. Where, as here, the case is tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13190 - 2005-03-31
days of the entry of the December judgment, at the latest. Where, as here, the case is tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13190 - 2005-03-31