Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34941 - 34950 of 36673 for e z.
Search results 34941 - 34950 of 36673 for e z.
Patricia H. Roth v. LaFarge School District Board of Canvassers
, count the number of ballots therein, excluding ballots removed under s. 7.51 (2) (e). Then, for each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3514 - 2005-03-31
, count the number of ballots therein, excluding ballots removed under s. 7.51 (2) (e). Then, for each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3514 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
whether it provides an appropriate basis for the [trial] court’s decision.’” Id. (citation omitted). “[E
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94785 - 2013-03-27
whether it provides an appropriate basis for the [trial] court’s decision.’” Id. (citation omitted). “[E
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94785 - 2013-03-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
order is to ‘strik[e] from [the] warrant those severable phrases and clauses that are invalid for lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=689320 - 2023-08-15
order is to ‘strik[e] from [the] warrant those severable phrases and clauses that are invalid for lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=689320 - 2023-08-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not make a specific ruling. As we concluded in Keith, “[w]e need not resolve this dispute over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=550512 - 2022-08-02
not make a specific ruling. As we concluded in Keith, “[w]e need not resolve this dispute over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=550512 - 2022-08-02
[PDF]
State v. John T. Shaw
in a ch. 980, STATS., case is as follows: "[W]e reverse only if the evidence viewed in the light most
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14025 - 2014-09-15
in a ch. 980, STATS., case is as follows: "[W]e reverse only if the evidence viewed in the light most
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14025 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
120, ¶43, 344 Wis. 2d 610, 823 N.W.2d 816. Nos. 2023AP605 2023AP1411 17 ¶40 “[W]e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=818006 - 2024-06-25
120, ¶43, 344 Wis. 2d 610, 823 N.W.2d 816. Nos. 2023AP605 2023AP1411 17 ¶40 “[W]e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=818006 - 2024-06-25
[PDF]
State v. Kenosha County Board of Adjustment
ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the plaintiff-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of James E. Doyle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10761 - 2017-09-20
ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the plaintiff-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of James E. Doyle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10761 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Earl L. Miller
, the cause was submitted on the brief of Sandra L. Tarver, assistant attorney general, and James E. Doyle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14291 - 2014-09-15
, the cause was submitted on the brief of Sandra L. Tarver, assistant attorney general, and James E. Doyle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14291 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
colloquy due to the court’s failure to “[e]stablish the defendant’s understanding of the … range
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83298 - 2012-06-06
colloquy due to the court’s failure to “[e]stablish the defendant’s understanding of the … range
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83298 - 2012-06-06
COURT OF APPEALS
[imited] C[ommon] E[lement areas] 2, 3, and 4?” SWS argues that the undisputed evidence at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60123 - 2011-02-16
[imited] C[ommon] E[lement areas] 2, 3, and 4?” SWS argues that the undisputed evidence at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60123 - 2011-02-16