Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34951 - 34960 of 97638 for court records search online.
Search results 34951 - 34960 of 97638 for court records search online.
State v. John T. Shaw
determinations on a case-by-case basis. See id. The record reflects that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14025 - 2005-03-31
determinations on a case-by-case basis. See id. The record reflects that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14025 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John T. Shaw
." No. 98-1396 10 The record reflects that the trial court considered the reports' relevancy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14025 - 2014-09-15
." No. 98-1396 10 The record reflects that the trial court considered the reports' relevancy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14025 - 2014-09-15
State v. Calvin Gregory
it could not consider reasons that were not part of the record and therefore focused on what the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2477 - 2005-03-31
it could not consider reasons that were not part of the record and therefore focused on what the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2477 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Calvin Gregory
not of record. Defense counsel may have intended to ask for an adjournment when the trial court interrupted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2477 - 2017-09-19
not of record. Defense counsel may have intended to ask for an adjournment when the trial court interrupted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2477 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 21, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
and for reasonable attorney fees. Because the record demonstrates that the trial court erred in its calculation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27190 - 2006-11-20
and for reasonable attorney fees. Because the record demonstrates that the trial court erred in its calculation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27190 - 2006-11-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
, the trial court signed the judgment. The trial court made no record of its reasoning for allowing all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27190 - 2014-09-15
, the trial court signed the judgment. The trial court made no record of its reasoning for allowing all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27190 - 2014-09-15
Harborview Office Center, LLC v. Camosy Incorporated
the judgments against Harborview. BACKGROUND ¶2 As the trial court noted, the record in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21390 - 2006-02-14
the judgments against Harborview. BACKGROUND ¶2 As the trial court noted, the record in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21390 - 2006-02-14
[PDF]
Harborview Office Center, LLC v. Camosy Incorporated
the respondents on several grounds. Harborview alleges that the record does not support the court’s finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21390 - 2017-09-21
the respondents on several grounds. Harborview alleges that the record does not support the court’s finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21390 - 2017-09-21
Childeric Maxy v. Julia Meyer
The next document in the record is a letter from Maxy to the court, filed December 27, 2000, inquiring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3506 - 2005-03-31
The next document in the record is a letter from Maxy to the court, filed December 27, 2000, inquiring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3506 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for a family court order. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798544 - 2024-05-09
for a family court order. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798544 - 2024-05-09