Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34951 - 34960 of 64735 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 34951 - 34960 of 64735 for divorce records/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for SAP. Taking the circuit court’s statements in context, the record supports the conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172786 - 2017-09-21
for SAP. Taking the circuit court’s statements in context, the record supports the conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172786 - 2017-09-21
Phaedra P. v. Dennis A.
is preempted by the PKPA. However, the record does not support a conflict between the PKPA and the UCCJA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7165 - 2005-03-31
is preempted by the PKPA. However, the record does not support a conflict between the PKPA and the UCCJA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7165 - 2005-03-31
City of Sheboygan v. Jason R. Zimbal
party by the last name of Zimbal. A further record search revealed prior vehicle contact history
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7309 - 2005-03-31
party by the last name of Zimbal. A further record search revealed prior vehicle contact history
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7309 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
record of criminal offenses; (2) history of undesirable behavior pattern; (3) the defendant’s personality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49039 - 2010-04-19
record of criminal offenses; (2) history of undesirable behavior pattern; (3) the defendant’s personality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49039 - 2010-04-19
COURT OF APPEALS
properly exercises its discretion if it relies on the relevant facts in the record and applies the proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36269 - 2009-04-27
properly exercises its discretion if it relies on the relevant facts in the record and applies the proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36269 - 2009-04-27
COURT OF APPEALS
by credible and substantial evidence in the record. Bunker v. LIRC, 2002 WI App 216, ¶30, 257 Wis. 2d 255
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50987 - 2010-06-15
by credible and substantial evidence in the record. Bunker v. LIRC, 2002 WI App 216, ¶30, 257 Wis. 2d 255
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50987 - 2010-06-15
CA Blank Order
)(f). Upon consideration of these submissions and an independent review of the record, including
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131836 - 2014-12-22
)(f). Upon consideration of these submissions and an independent review of the record, including
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131836 - 2014-12-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
discretion because (1) the record did not support the court’s rationale for the sentence imposed, and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32710 - 2014-09-15
discretion because (1) the record did not support the court’s rationale for the sentence imposed, and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32710 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
because, within the appendix, Penkalski has typed out what he claims are portions of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=639381 - 2023-03-30
because, within the appendix, Penkalski has typed out what he claims are portions of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=639381 - 2023-03-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
was not in the record of the first reexamination proceeding. We see nothing, however, that compels us to consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27905 - 2014-09-15
was not in the record of the first reexamination proceeding. We see nothing, however, that compels us to consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27905 - 2014-09-15