Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34951 - 34960 of 63519 for records/1000.
Search results 34951 - 34960 of 63519 for records/1000.
State v. Quinn Johnson
and the record does not disclose any specific prejudice that resulted from his counsel’s failure to request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14074 - 2005-03-31
and the record does not disclose any specific prejudice that resulted from his counsel’s failure to request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14074 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief.” See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90306 - 2012-12-12
allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief.” See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90306 - 2012-12-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169111 - 2017-09-21
elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169111 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192045 - 2017-09-21
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192045 - 2017-09-21
State v. Buren F. Sprague
it refused to accept his offer to stipulate to his prior drunk driving record. He relies upon Old Chief v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13009 - 2005-03-31
it refused to accept his offer to stipulate to his prior drunk driving record. He relies upon Old Chief v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13009 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
agree. We reverse the judgments and remand for further proceedings. ¶2 The record reflects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34673 - 2008-11-25
agree. We reverse the judgments and remand for further proceedings. ¶2 The record reflects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34673 - 2008-11-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592962 - 2022-11-22
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592962 - 2022-11-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
considering the no-merit report and conducting an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=459758 - 2021-12-07
considering the no-merit report and conducting an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=459758 - 2021-12-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
she is Lexi’s owner. Specifically, Peebles asserts the record shows she and Handrich picked up Lexi
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81027 - 2014-09-15
she is Lexi’s owner. Specifically, Peebles asserts the record shows she and Handrich picked up Lexi
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81027 - 2014-09-15
Clarence Werner v. Wayne Nohelty
determination that the evidence Werner presented was not newly-discovered evidence. Our review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15508 - 2005-03-31
determination that the evidence Werner presented was not newly-discovered evidence. Our review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15508 - 2005-03-31