Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34961 - 34970 of 63321 for Motion for joint custody.

State v. Wilfredo Melo
cocaine. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11060 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Richard L. Harris
postconviction motion. NOS. 96-1233-CR 96-1234-CR 97-1428-CR 97-1429-CR 2 Harris claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10759 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm. No. 2013AP1274-CR 2 ¶2 Eckstein
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108236 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Mayfair Property, Inc.
, 1994. The trial court’s judgment granted the summary judgment motion filed by the defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15184 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the man make “a stutter step motion to his left, to the north.” The officer testified: “I’ve been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237938 - 2019-03-26

City of Clintonville v. Michael J. Kuhn
of a city ordinance. He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3919 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] John M. Baker v.
a postconviction motion within 20 days and to inform the court that he had done so. When the Court of Appeals
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17250 - 2017-09-21

State v. William Staples
that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence. Specifically, Staples argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2697 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Village of Hales Corners v. Michael V. Hendricks
, appeals from the circuit court’s March 24, 2003 orders denying his motions for reconsideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6482 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction and the order denying his postconviction motion for resentencing. Seeing no breach of the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36585 - 2009-05-26