Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34961 - 34970 of 69007 for had.
Search results 34961 - 34970 of 69007 for had.
State v. Thomas Sparks
"without my attorney" should not be construed as a refusal because the police officer had a duty to inform
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8624 - 2005-03-31
"without my attorney" should not be construed as a refusal because the police officer had a duty to inform
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8624 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dennis L. Farr
on his motion, Farr testified that trial counsel did not explain to him that he had valid defenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11495 - 2005-03-31
on his motion, Farr testified that trial counsel did not explain to him that he had valid defenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11495 - 2005-03-31
State v. David F. Burbach
stated that he had “compare[d] the speed of his … car as shown on the … car’s speedometer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13321 - 2005-03-31
stated that he had “compare[d] the speed of his … car as shown on the … car’s speedometer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13321 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to support the $25 charge, but the State had not yet done so. We granted an extension to February 29, 2016
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169244 - 2017-09-21
to support the $25 charge, but the State had not yet done so. We granted an extension to February 29, 2016
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169244 - 2017-09-21
Paula Lucas v. Delano E. Lucas
court did not address whether there had been a substantial change in circumstances before modifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6830 - 2005-03-31
court did not address whether there had been a substantial change in circumstances before modifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6830 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
committed legal malpractice in pursuing his claim of legal malpractice against attorneys who had pursued his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34664 - 2008-11-19
committed legal malpractice in pursuing his claim of legal malpractice against attorneys who had pursued his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34664 - 2008-11-19
Marsha Lubinski v. Robert Lubinski
)(a). The parties informally modified the placement schedule and during the most recent year, Robert had Ryan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10613 - 2005-03-31
)(a). The parties informally modified the placement schedule and during the most recent year, Robert had Ryan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10613 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lawrence P. Sajdik
suppression motion,[1] claiming that his belief that he had been granted immunity prevented him from knowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8224 - 2005-03-31
suppression motion,[1] claiming that his belief that he had been granted immunity prevented him from knowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8224 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
with the circuit court’s assessment on all three points, we focus here on whether Bossmann had a claim capable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29177 - 2007-05-23
with the circuit court’s assessment on all three points, we focus here on whether Bossmann had a claim capable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29177 - 2007-05-23
[PDF]
County of Jefferson v. Matthew Riley
discovered that after he had entered a no contest plea pursuant to a stipulation with the district attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9850 - 2017-09-19
discovered that after he had entered a no contest plea pursuant to a stipulation with the district attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9850 - 2017-09-19