Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34961 - 34970 of 46074 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 34961 - 34970 of 46074 for paternity test paper work.
State v. Sky B. Busk
a reasonable doubt. Our “confidence” in the verdict under the Strickland prejudice test must be considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25036 - 2006-05-03
a reasonable doubt. Our “confidence” in the verdict under the Strickland prejudice test must be considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25036 - 2006-05-03
COURT OF APPEALS
motion, and McIntyre, represented by counsel, now appeals. DISCUSSION ¶10 The test for ambiguity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132254 - 2014-12-29
motion, and McIntyre, represented by counsel, now appeals. DISCUSSION ¶10 The test for ambiguity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132254 - 2014-12-29
James R. Schultz v. Gerald Berge
of the rule, we need not engage in the City of Green Bay “balancing test” which the supreme court said
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11567 - 2005-03-31
of the rule, we need not engage in the City of Green Bay “balancing test” which the supreme court said
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11567 - 2005-03-31
Robert Vines, Jr. v. Ken Sondalle
U.S. at 107. Subjective recklessness as used in the criminal law is the test for “deliberate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12947 - 2005-03-31
U.S. at 107. Subjective recklessness as used in the criminal law is the test for “deliberate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12947 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
“must prevail on both parts of the test to be afforded relief.” State v. Allen, 2004 WI 106, ¶26, 274
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708334 - 2023-10-03
“must prevail on both parts of the test to be afforded relief.” State v. Allen, 2004 WI 106, ¶26, 274
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708334 - 2023-10-03
State v. James R. Sieger
test requires the defendant to show that counsel’s performance was deficient—that counsel made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12702 - 2005-03-31
test requires the defendant to show that counsel’s performance was deficient—that counsel made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12702 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
not survive the Sullivan test anyway because, rather than proving knowledge or absence of mistake, it tended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81547 - 2012-05-01
not survive the Sullivan test anyway because, rather than proving knowledge or absence of mistake, it tended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81547 - 2012-05-01
State v. Kenny L. Warren
). The manifest injustice test is satisfied by a showing that the defendant received ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19322 - 2005-08-15
). The manifest injustice test is satisfied by a showing that the defendant received ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19322 - 2005-08-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
stronger” test relative to appellate counsel, not postconviction counsel. No. 2014AP1329 6
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144242 - 2017-09-21
stronger” test relative to appellate counsel, not postconviction counsel. No. 2014AP1329 6
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144242 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is set out in Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976). The test involves balancing three factors: 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191395 - 2017-09-21
is set out in Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976). The test involves balancing three factors: 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191395 - 2017-09-21