Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34971 - 34980 of 64843 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 34971 - 34980 of 64843 for divorce records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=524367 - 2022-05-25
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=524367 - 2022-05-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. We affirm based upon our independent review of the record. BACKGROUND ¶2 The State initially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238128 - 2019-03-26
. We affirm based upon our independent review of the record. BACKGROUND ¶2 The State initially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238128 - 2019-03-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by the parties. On this record, any error in addressing the jury’s question was harmless. See May v. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251812 - 2020-01-02
by the parties. On this record, any error in addressing the jury’s question was harmless. See May v. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251812 - 2020-01-02
[PDF]
County of Waukesha v. Robert M. Hallenbeck
returned from the record check procedure and conducted field sobriety tests.1 As a result of those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9876 - 2017-09-19
returned from the record check procedure and conducted field sobriety tests.1 As a result of those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9876 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the briefs and No. 2023AP1090-CR 2 Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=853076 - 2024-09-25
of the briefs and No. 2023AP1090-CR 2 Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=853076 - 2024-09-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
wanted to hire private counsel or proceed pro se. However, based on the record and upon (continued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183673 - 2017-09-21
wanted to hire private counsel or proceed pro se. However, based on the record and upon (continued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183673 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Bradford J. May
unreasonable or unjustified basis for the sentence in the record. See id. at 622-23, 350 N.W.2d at 638-39
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12390 - 2017-09-21
unreasonable or unjustified basis for the sentence in the record. See id. at 622-23, 350 N.W.2d at 638-39
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12390 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
for resentencing because the trial court failed to state on the record why it did not order a [presentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97549 - 2013-06-03
for resentencing because the trial court failed to state on the record why it did not order a [presentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97549 - 2013-06-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=742047 - 2023-12-19
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=742047 - 2023-12-19
State v. Andres Godina
and the length of sentence were discussed. However, there is nothing in this record to persuade us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13093 - 2005-03-31
and the length of sentence were discussed. However, there is nothing in this record to persuade us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13093 - 2005-03-31