Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34981 - 34990 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.

COURT OF APPEALS
granted his motion to dismiss because his Facebook comments were protected speech. The State argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115994 - 2014-07-02

State v. Randy D. Stafford
his motions for postconviction relief and for reconsideration. Among other things, Stafford alleges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4991 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - March 2007
the amount actually paid by the health insurance provider. The trial court denied the motion, ruling
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28284 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Nauga, Inc. v. Westel Milwaukee Company, Inc.
also argues that Judge DiMotto erred as a matter of law in denying its motion to enforce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10015 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] John Nierengarten v. Lutheran Social Services of Wisconsin and Upper Michigan, Inc.
upon which relief may be granted.1 It accompanied the motion with an affidavit of Carol Hakala
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11186 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI App 9
denying his motion to dismiss criminal charges of failing to install an ignition interlock device (IID
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1058517 - 2026-03-24

[PDF] WI APP 30
as a party to the crime. Jereczek argues the circuit court erroneously denied his suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353454 - 2021-06-14

[PDF] State v. Paul I. Ekblad
motion for postconviction relief. Ekblad argues that we should vacate his judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4507 - 2017-09-19

State v. Susan M. Vetos
denied Vetos’s motion after concluding that “on the current state of the law the complaint meets
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5431 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Jennifer Switzer v. Jonathan C. Switzer
HIGGINBOTHAM, J. Jennifer Switzer appeals an order denying her motion for reconsideration of an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20739 - 2017-09-21