Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34981 - 34990 of 40262 for financial disclosure statements.
Search results 34981 - 34990 of 40262 for financial disclosure statements.
[PDF]
State v. David Vigil
a review of the entire record, including the sentencing record as well as defense counsel’s statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7436 - 2017-09-20
a review of the entire record, including the sentencing record as well as defense counsel’s statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7436 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Michael T. v. Norma Briggs
). The statement in the child-abuse injunction statute, § 813.122(3)(b)1, STATS., that guardians ad litem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10789 - 2017-09-20
). The statement in the child-abuse injunction statute, § 813.122(3)(b)1, STATS., that guardians ad litem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10789 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI APP 138
” and “prohibited” do not appear in this statute, an ordinary reading of the statement that the “term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89436 - 2014-09-15
” and “prohibited” do not appear in this statute, an ordinary reading of the statement that the “term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89436 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Leonard A. Sarnowski
statements” by Sarnowski and his former wife about whether Sarnowski worked from October 1, 2000, to May
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7371 - 2017-09-20
statements” by Sarnowski and his former wife about whether Sarnowski worked from October 1, 2000, to May
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7371 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“a statement of everything the Intelligence Fusion Center of Milwaukee Police Department has on Mr. Griffis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193980 - 2017-09-21
“a statement of everything the Intelligence Fusion Center of Milwaukee Police Department has on Mr. Griffis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193980 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 35
objected to the court’s statement of fact nor argued to the contrary either before or after the comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78512 - 2014-09-15
objected to the court’s statement of fact nor argued to the contrary either before or after the comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78512 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a witness to call to establish a prior inconsistent statement. ¶6 The court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88087 - 2014-09-15
a witness to call to establish a prior inconsistent statement. ¶6 The court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88087 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Guy N. Giese
was inconsistent. Inconsistencies and contradictions in the statements of witnesses do not render the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10925 - 2017-09-20
was inconsistent. Inconsistencies and contradictions in the statements of witnesses do not render the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10925 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Christa Brojanac
of the interior of the car confirmed Brojanac’s statement that she was alone. The car had bucket seats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2963 - 2017-09-19
of the interior of the car confirmed Brojanac’s statement that she was alone. The car had bucket seats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2963 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Robert S. Martinez
consent. We agree with the trial court’s reasoning: [I]ndeed it could be argued that the statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3173 - 2017-09-19
consent. We agree with the trial court’s reasoning: [I]ndeed it could be argued that the statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3173 - 2017-09-19