Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34981 - 34990 of 58511 for speedy trial.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
After he was found guilty in municipal court, Hrin appealed to the circuit court for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184274 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. John A. Gatt
of an intoxicant, second offense, contrary to § 346.63(1)(a), STATS. He contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13938 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
there is any arguably meritorious claim that Adams received ineffective assistance from trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722015 - 2023-10-31

County of Jefferson v. Steven P. Fleming
under the influence of an intoxicant. Fleming moved the trial court to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11593 - 2005-03-31

State v. Allan Lloyd Waldo
violent person pursuant to the sexual predator law. A jury trial was scheduled for June 2, 1997. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3655 - 2005-03-31

Ruth Ann Hackman v. First Bank Southeast of Lake Geneva, N.A.
judgment, we apply the same methodology as the trial court and decide de novo whether summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10952 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Laura K. Hanson v. Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company
, and the other a commercial umbrella insurance policy. Because we conclude that the trial court correctly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5971 - 2017-09-19

State v. Donna E. Howard-Hastings
the trial court denied. She appeals. The sole issue confronting us is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13132 - 2005-03-31

National Brokerage Services of Wisconsin, Inc. v. United Wisconsin Insurance Company
to allow the trial court to exercise its discretion under § 814.036, Stats., whether to award such costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7682 - 2005-03-31

Jane Drangstviet v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
is inapplicable. Thus, we affirm the trial court. BACKGROUND The facts are undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8477 - 2005-03-31