Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 351 - 360 of 17366 for Cost.
Search results 351 - 360 of 17366 for Cost.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of costs under WIS. STAT. § 814.03 (2021-22).1 We reject J&J’s arguments in its appeal, but we agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699971 - 2023-09-06
of costs under WIS. STAT. § 814.03 (2021-22).1 We reject J&J’s arguments in its appeal, but we agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699971 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. This “$83,525 consisted of $75,175 for the in-place value of the billboard, i.e. the cost to build
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115254 - 2017-09-21
. This “$83,525 consisted of $75,175 for the in-place value of the billboard, i.e. the cost to build
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115254 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Jacqueline M. Grosshans v. William J. Grosshans
school education costs of the minor children according to their respective abilities to pay, up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25803 - 2017-09-21
school education costs of the minor children according to their respective abilities to pay, up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25803 - 2017-09-21
Jacqueline M. Grosshans v. William J. Grosshans
EDUCATION. Each of the parties agrees to contribute to the post-high school education costs of the minor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25803 - 2006-07-05
EDUCATION. Each of the parties agrees to contribute to the post-high school education costs of the minor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25803 - 2006-07-05
COURT OF APPEALS
for the in-place value of the billboard, i.e. the cost to build the billboard new; $2,500 for relocation expenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115254 - 2014-06-24
for the in-place value of the billboard, i.e. the cost to build the billboard new; $2,500 for relocation expenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115254 - 2014-06-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
the taxation of costs. We affirm the judgment. ¶2 The annexation was accomplished in November 2008
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60001 - 2014-09-15
the taxation of costs. We affirm the judgment. ¶2 The annexation was accomplished in November 2008
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60001 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
are uniquely affected by the annexation. HJCG also challenges the taxation of costs. We affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60001 - 2011-02-15
are uniquely affected by the annexation. HJCG also challenges the taxation of costs. We affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60001 - 2011-02-15
[PDF]
for a proportion of the costs that MSA incurred in maintaining the “[e]asement [a]rea” created by the Agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872590 - 2024-11-07
for a proportion of the costs that MSA incurred in maintaining the “[e]asement [a]rea” created by the Agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872590 - 2024-11-07
[PDF]
WI App 7
; and (3) Krueger’s claims for taxable costs were not forfeited despite the fact that the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232851 - 2019-03-14
; and (3) Krueger’s claims for taxable costs were not forfeited despite the fact that the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232851 - 2019-03-14
COURT OF APPEALS
court to explain how it addressed the cost of materials paid by the Derricks when it calculated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107304 - 2014-01-28
court to explain how it addressed the cost of materials paid by the Derricks when it calculated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107304 - 2014-01-28