Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 351 - 360 of 2423 for nys.
Search results 351 - 360 of 2423 for nys.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
With respect to the monetary penalty Smith sought, “[a]ny judge who refuses to grant a writ of habeas corpus
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202770 - 2017-11-16
With respect to the monetary penalty Smith sought, “[a]ny judge who refuses to grant a writ of habeas corpus
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202770 - 2017-11-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
), a catch-all provision allowing relief for “[a]ny other No. 2016AP984 4 reasons justifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192692 - 2017-09-21
), a catch-all provision allowing relief for “[a]ny other No. 2016AP984 4 reasons justifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192692 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Terrance T.S.
fall under § 48.315(1)(f), which provides that “[a]ny period of delay resulting from the absence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9713 - 2017-09-19
fall under § 48.315(1)(f), which provides that “[a]ny period of delay resulting from the absence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9713 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
be responsible for “[a]ny and all debt related to the business known as Lavender Thymes.” The MSA also provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76500 - 2012-01-17
be responsible for “[a]ny and all debt related to the business known as Lavender Thymes.” The MSA also provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76500 - 2012-01-17
COURT OF APPEALS
a variety of specified reasons, or upon a catchall provision of “[a]ny other reason justifying relief from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81888 - 2012-05-02
a variety of specified reasons, or upon a catchall provision of “[a]ny other reason justifying relief from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81888 - 2012-05-02
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
for No. 2012AP860 3 “[a]ny other reasons justifying relief from the operation of the judgment.”2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93182 - 2014-09-15
for No. 2012AP860 3 “[a]ny other reasons justifying relief from the operation of the judgment.”2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93182 - 2014-09-15
Samuels Recycling Company v. Continental Casualty Company
for “[a]ny other reasons justifying relief from the operation of the judgment.” Relief under this provision
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1233 - 2005-01-26
for “[a]ny other reasons justifying relief from the operation of the judgment.” Relief under this provision
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1233 - 2005-01-26
[PDF]
Spencer McClain v. Marianne A. Cooke
rules, “use of intoxicants” is defined as “[a]ny inmate who intentionally takes into his or her body
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11300 - 2017-09-19
rules, “use of intoxicants” is defined as “[a]ny inmate who intentionally takes into his or her body
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11300 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
authorities. ¶10 “[A]ny fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38434 - 2009-07-27
authorities. ¶10 “[A]ny fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38434 - 2009-07-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and their relationship, the probability that the defendant “will commit other violations in the future,” and “[a]ny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210971 - 2018-04-11
and their relationship, the probability that the defendant “will commit other violations in the future,” and “[a]ny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210971 - 2018-04-11