Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 351 - 360 of 60982 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 351 - 360 of 60982 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
NOTICE
determination that the title was not claimed under the personal representative’s deed in good faith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54735 - 2014-09-15
determination that the title was not claimed under the personal representative’s deed in good faith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54735 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that awarded legal title to a disputed parcel of property to Joseph Cogan Jr. and Mary Cogan. Gladys claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54735 - 2010-09-22
that awarded legal title to a disputed parcel of property to Joseph Cogan Jr. and Mary Cogan. Gladys claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54735 - 2010-09-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the deed are material to Lori’s claim against Kay under the two-element test. The parties dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241387 - 2019-05-30
the deed are material to Lori’s claim against Kay under the two-element test. The parties dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241387 - 2019-05-30
Patrick D. Affeldt v. Yehuda Elmakias
restriction violation constitutes a nuisance; (10) he is entitled to damages on the deed restriction claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12656 - 2005-03-31
restriction violation constitutes a nuisance; (10) he is entitled to damages on the deed restriction claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12656 - 2005-03-31
Patrick D. Affeldt v. Yehuda Elmakias
restriction violation constitutes a nuisance; (10) he is entitled to damages on the deed restriction claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12307 - 2005-03-31
restriction violation constitutes a nuisance; (10) he is entitled to damages on the deed restriction claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12307 - 2005-03-31
Patrick D. Affeldt v. Yehuda Elmakias
restriction violation constitutes a nuisance; (10) he is entitled to damages on the deed restriction claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11916 - 2005-03-31
restriction violation constitutes a nuisance; (10) he is entitled to damages on the deed restriction claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11916 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, he claims that his due process rights were violated because the City did not prove scienter, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140335 - 2017-09-21
, he claims that his due process rights were violated because the City did not prove scienter, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140335 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
two arguments on his appeal. First, he claims that his due process rights were violated because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140335 - 2015-04-28
two arguments on his appeal. First, he claims that his due process rights were violated because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140335 - 2015-04-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Agreement, in turn, stated that upon execution of the agreement, CMM would provide the deeds to six
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1158422 - 2026-08-11
Agreement, in turn, stated that upon execution of the agreement, CMM would provide the deeds to six
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1158422 - 2026-08-11
Irving G. Wenzel v. Washburn County
adverse possession claims survive the tax deed process. Because we conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8767 - 2005-03-31
adverse possession claims survive the tax deed process. Because we conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8767 - 2005-03-31