Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 351 - 360 of 60097 for quit claim deed/1000.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, he claims that his due process rights were violated because the City did not prove scienter, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140335 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
two arguments on his appeal. First, he claims that his due process rights were violated because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140335 - 2015-04-28

Ronald C. Kleutgen v. Robert A. McFadyen, Jr.
as the “northern deeded parcel” and the “southern deeded parcel.” ¶4 The Kleutgens’ northern deeded parcel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20079 - 2005-11-06

[PDF] Ronald C. Kleutgen v. Robert A. McFadyen, Jr.
case, Ronald and Kathleen Kleutgen. We will refer to these parcels as the “northern deeded parcel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20079 - 2017-09-21

Irving G. Wenzel v. Washburn County
adverse possession claims survive the tax deed process. Because we conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8767 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the affidavits filed with the Register of Deeds. After Bye and the Larsons filed suit, Sire filed a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112598 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
with the Register of Deeds. After Bye and the Larsons filed suit, Sire filed a claim with Stewart Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112598 - 2014-05-19

[PDF] Anton F. Schorsch v. James Blader
from a breach of warranty of title, for land it attempted to convey. The District claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10752 - 2017-09-20

Anton F. Schorsch v. James Blader
of warranty of title, for land it attempted to convey. The District claims the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10752 - 2005-03-31

Carol L. Dodge v. James M. Schneider
claim to a piece of real property. She argues on appeal that the circuit court improperly granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7250 - 2005-03-31