Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 351 - 360 of 18663 for quote.
Search results 351 - 360 of 18663 for quote.
[PDF]
Matthew Kulbiski v. Michael DeMarco
whether Brian DeMarco did quote “reside primarily,” closed quote, with No. 02-1662 6 his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5386 - 2017-09-19
whether Brian DeMarco did quote “reside primarily,” closed quote, with No. 02-1662 6 his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5386 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. Ortega v. McCaughtry, 221 Wis. 2d 376, 386, 585 N.W.2d 640 (Ct. App. 1998) (citation omitted) (quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141358 - 2015-05-06
. Ortega v. McCaughtry, 221 Wis. 2d 376, 386, 585 N.W.2d 640 (Ct. App. 1998) (citation omitted) (quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141358 - 2015-05-06
State v. Gordon Greer
U.S. 436, 444 (1966), quoted in Leprich, 160 Wis.2d at 476-77, 465 N.W.2d at 845. Not every
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9252 - 2005-03-31
U.S. 436, 444 (1966), quoted in Leprich, 160 Wis.2d at 476-77, 465 N.W.2d at 845. Not every
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9252 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circumstances.’” State v. Stenzel, 2004 WI App 181, ¶21, 276 Wis. 2d 224, 688 N.W.2d 20 (quoting Ocanas v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=349567 - 2021-03-25
the circumstances.’” State v. Stenzel, 2004 WI App 181, ¶21, 276 Wis. 2d 224, 688 N.W.2d 20 (quoting Ocanas v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=349567 - 2021-03-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a reasoned conclusion.’” Id. (quoting Voecks v. Voecks, 171 Wis. 2d 184, 189, 491 N.W.2d 107 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=981051 - 2025-08-07
a reasoned conclusion.’” Id. (quoting Voecks v. Voecks, 171 Wis. 2d 184, 189, 491 N.W.2d 107 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=981051 - 2025-08-07
James P. Zientek v. Robert C. Smith
proceedings." Id. (quoted source omitted). "[C]laim preclusion is designed to draw a line between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9133 - 2005-03-31
proceedings." Id. (quoted source omitted). "[C]laim preclusion is designed to draw a line between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9133 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ricky A. Myhre
a defendant after a new trial, the reasons for … doing so must affirmatively appear.” Id., ¶31 (quoting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25935 - 2017-09-21
a defendant after a new trial, the reasons for … doing so must affirmatively appear.” Id., ¶31 (quoting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25935 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
2024AP000164 - 3/12/24 Court Order
, ¶21, 260 Wis. 2d 633, 660 N.W.2d 656 (quoting State ex rel. Angela M.W. v. Kruzicki, 209 Wis. 2d 112
/supreme/docs/2024AP164order.pdf - 2024-03-13
, ¶21, 260 Wis. 2d 633, 660 N.W.2d 656 (quoting State ex rel. Angela M.W. v. Kruzicki, 209 Wis. 2d 112
/supreme/docs/2024AP164order.pdf - 2024-03-13
[PDF]
James P. Zientek v. Robert C. Smith
or which might have been litigated in the former proceedings." Id. (quoted source omitted). "[C]laim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9133 - 2017-09-19
or which might have been litigated in the former proceedings." Id. (quoted source omitted). "[C]laim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9133 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Eugene Stern v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
the facts alleged and the legal theory advanced.’”3 Id. (quoted source omitted). Neither losing the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11290 - 2017-09-19
the facts alleged and the legal theory advanced.’”3 Id. (quoted source omitted). Neither losing the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11290 - 2017-09-19