Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 351 - 360 of 60449 for two.
Search results 351 - 360 of 60449 for two.
[PDF]
State v. Adrienne Luber
on two different grounds and that a retrial is also barred by statute, by the doctrine of collateral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2275 - 2017-09-19
on two different grounds and that a retrial is also barred by statute, by the doctrine of collateral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2275 - 2017-09-19
State v. Robert Simmons
. Background. ¶2 On June 24, 2003, at approximately 9:00 p.m., two on‑duty Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7353 - 2005-03-31
. Background. ¶2 On June 24, 2003, at approximately 9:00 p.m., two on‑duty Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7353 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
entered pleas of no contest to two counts of uttering a forgery as a repeat offender (counts one and two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34444 - 2008-11-04
entered pleas of no contest to two counts of uttering a forgery as a repeat offender (counts one and two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34444 - 2008-11-04
[PDF]
State v. Robert Simmons
, at approximately 9:00 p.m., two on-duty Milwaukee police officers were driving a marked squad car through an area
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7353 - 2017-09-20
, at approximately 9:00 p.m., two on-duty Milwaukee police officers were driving a marked squad car through an area
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7353 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
years for this offense, consisting of two years of initial confinement and four years of extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34444 - 2014-09-15
years for this offense, consisting of two years of initial confinement and four years of extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34444 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Sandra L. Barrette
trial because two hearing impaired jurors were permitted to remain on the jury. The State contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14662 - 2017-09-21
trial because two hearing impaired jurors were permitted to remain on the jury. The State contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14662 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. William C. Rosenberg
it permitted two prior municipal court OWI convictions to be considered in enhancing his sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2764 - 2017-09-19
it permitted two prior municipal court OWI convictions to be considered in enhancing his sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2764 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jason M. Mulroy
appeals a judgment, entered upon his no contest pleas, convicting him of two counts of causing great
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6757 - 2005-03-31
appeals a judgment, entered upon his no contest pleas, convicting him of two counts of causing great
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6757 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph F. Michalkiewicz
as substantive evidence at trial, because the State waited twenty-two years to prosecute him, and because a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21090 - 2006-01-31
as substantive evidence at trial, because the State waited twenty-two years to prosecute him, and because a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21090 - 2006-01-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
convicting him of two counts of first-degree sexual assault of a child and two counts of sexual
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=625441 - 2023-02-21
convicting him of two counts of first-degree sexual assault of a child and two counts of sexual
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=625441 - 2023-02-21