Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 351 - 360 of 20851 for word.
Search results 351 - 360 of 20851 for word.
State v. Steven C. Billiat
that the word “habitual” should be deleted from the judgment because this word is irrelevant. He asserted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13742 - 2005-03-31
that the word “habitual” should be deleted from the judgment because this word is irrelevant. He asserted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13742 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael R. Alger
the word “here” for “near.” We assume arguendo that the word “here” is not a transcriptional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15359 - 2017-09-21
the word “here” for “near.” We assume arguendo that the word “here” is not a transcriptional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15359 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
). ¶14 We interpret the relevant words of the statute in accordance with their "common and approved
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=675788 - 2023-06-30
). ¶14 We interpret the relevant words of the statute in accordance with their "common and approved
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=675788 - 2023-06-30
[PDF]
March 27, 2014
, the rules in effect in other states, the age of the current wording, and the OLR’s assurance
/supreme/docs/1405commentswiesmueller.pdf - 2015-02-18
, the rules in effect in other states, the age of the current wording, and the OLR’s assurance
/supreme/docs/1405commentswiesmueller.pdf - 2015-02-18
[PDF]
State v. Pamela L. Peters
, or services. The doctrine of ejusdem generis is a "canon of construction that when a general word
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16573 - 2017-09-21
, or services. The doctrine of ejusdem generis is a "canon of construction that when a general word
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16573 - 2017-09-21
State v. James P.
was officially adjudicated the biological father based on DNA evidence. In other words, we must determine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18613 - 2005-06-16
was officially adjudicated the biological father based on DNA evidence. In other words, we must determine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18613 - 2005-06-16
[PDF]
State v. James P.
before he was officially adjudicated the biological father based on DNA evidence. In other words, we
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18613 - 2017-09-21
before he was officially adjudicated the biological father based on DNA evidence. In other words, we
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18613 - 2017-09-21
Madison Reprographics, Inc. v. Cook's Reprographics, Inc.
rectangle surrounding the word "repro" in lower-case, bold, sans serif white letters; above the red
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9694 - 2005-03-31
rectangle surrounding the word "repro" in lower-case, bold, sans serif white letters; above the red
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9694 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
he told his lawyer that he did not understand the meaning of the word “substantial,” and his lawyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88220 - 2012-10-15
he told his lawyer that he did not understand the meaning of the word “substantial,” and his lawyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88220 - 2012-10-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
did not understand the meaning of the word “substantial,” and his lawyer responded that the word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88220 - 2014-09-15
did not understand the meaning of the word “substantial,” and his lawyer responded that the word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88220 - 2014-09-15