Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3501 - 3510 of 29740 for des.
Search results 3501 - 3510 of 29740 for des.
State v. Randy J. Stahl
to undisputed material facts, we decide it de novo, without deference to the trial court’s decision. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6940 - 2005-03-31
to undisputed material facts, we decide it de novo, without deference to the trial court’s decision. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6940 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joshua O. Kyles
that question de novo. State v. McGill, 2000 WI 38, ¶¶17 and 21, 234 Wis. 2d 560, 609 N.W.2d 795. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5332 - 2005-03-31
that question de novo. State v. McGill, 2000 WI 38, ¶¶17 and 21, 234 Wis. 2d 560, 609 N.W.2d 795. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5332 - 2005-03-31
State v. Phillip M. Hudson
court presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Jones, 2002 WI App 208, ¶8, 257 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21027 - 2006-01-23
court presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Jones, 2002 WI App 208, ¶8, 257 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21027 - 2006-01-23
[PDF]
Pastori M. Balele v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
because we are deciding this case on other grounds. No(s). 98-0687 3 review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13721 - 2014-09-15
because we are deciding this case on other grounds. No(s). 98-0687 3 review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13721 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit court must hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26630 - 2006-10-02
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit court must hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26630 - 2006-10-02
State v. David C. Haubrich
is a legal matter that we decide de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63, 65 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2198 - 2005-03-31
is a legal matter that we decide de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63, 65 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2198 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
involuntary is a legal question that we review de novo. This distinction is crucial in this case. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43713 - 2009-11-18
involuntary is a legal question that we review de novo. This distinction is crucial in this case. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43713 - 2009-11-18
Constance R. Smith v. Philip G. Smith
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: John A. Des Jardins, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6901 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: John A. Des Jardins, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6901 - 2005-03-31
Florence County v. Brad Richtig
. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Michels, 141 Wis.2d 81, 87
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13484 - 2005-03-31
. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Michels, 141 Wis.2d 81, 87
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13484 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit court must hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32475 - 2008-04-16
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit court must hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32475 - 2008-04-16