Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3501 - 3510 of 29942 for des.
Search results 3501 - 3510 of 29942 for des.
State v. John H. Jones, Jr.
is a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. However, if the defendant fails to allege sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12856 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. However, if the defendant fails to allege sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12856 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
St. John's Home of Milwaukee v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Social Services
is very nearly one of first impression. The lowest level of review, “de novo,” “is applied where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11485 - 2017-09-19
is very nearly one of first impression. The lowest level of review, “de novo,” “is applied where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11485 - 2017-09-19
State v. Troy Barner
entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. However, if the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9104 - 2005-03-31
entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. However, if the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9104 - 2005-03-31
James Munroe v. Patrick D. Braatz
of the trial court's decision is de novo: we independently examine the sufficiency of the custodian's reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9679 - 2005-03-31
of the trial court's decision is de novo: we independently examine the sufficiency of the custodian's reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9679 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael C. Curran
the application of constitutional principles to undisputed facts, we will review the trial court's decision de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11045 - 2005-03-31
the application of constitutional principles to undisputed facts, we will review the trial court's decision de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11045 - 2005-03-31
Richard G. Jankowski v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
The trial court granted the Hausmanns’ summary judgment dismissal motion. We review summary judgments de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13071 - 2005-03-31
The trial court granted the Hausmanns’ summary judgment dismissal motion. We review summary judgments de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13071 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. van de water, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J., Neubauer, P.J., and Anderson, J. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49029 - 2010-04-20
. van de water, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J., Neubauer, P.J., and Anderson, J. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49029 - 2010-04-20
2008 WI APP 139
presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See id., ¶11. ¶11 The Osborns’ argument fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33627 - 2008-08-04
presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See id., ¶11. ¶11 The Osborns’ argument fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33627 - 2008-08-04
Priscilla Larson v. The Estate of Sture A. Johnson
those facts, the applicability of a statute of limitations is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11490 - 2005-03-31
those facts, the applicability of a statute of limitations is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11490 - 2005-03-31
Katherine H. Leete v. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin
contentions require that we construe Wis. Stat. § 895.52, a question of law we review de novo. We must give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16250 - 2005-03-31
contentions require that we construe Wis. Stat. § 895.52, a question of law we review de novo. We must give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16250 - 2005-03-31