Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3501 - 3510 of 29942 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the interpretation of an insurance contract is a question of law reviewed de novo. Fontana Builders, Inc. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347442 - 2021-03-18

[PDF] State v. Alfonso L. Merriweather
it. Id. We review the motion de novo to determine whether sufficient facts are set forth which would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11610 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Jane Roe v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund
and the Fund from Roe’s cause of action. DISCUSSION We review de novo the trial court’s grant of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13407 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
factor is an issue of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶33. If the motion does not demonstrate a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1063985 - 2026-01-23

Uni-General Corporation v. Century 21 Great American Homes, Inc.
. Doughboy Recreational Inc., 160 Wis.2d 547, 559, 466 N.W.2d 897, 902 (1991). Our review is de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14049 - 2005-03-31

Heritage Mutual Insurance Company v. Richard J. Janda II
of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. M&I First Nat’l Bank v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3245 - 2005-03-31

Gordon P. Ralph v. Bank One Wisconsin
relief can be granted is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶10 Ralph
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4923 - 2005-03-31

Columbia County v. Keith A. Ballweg
de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102, 104 (Ct. App. 1994). We decline
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11303 - 2005-03-31

Steven Staudt v. Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital
is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315–317, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820–821 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11986 - 2013-08-13

2008 WI APP 139
presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See id., ¶11. ¶11 The Osborns’ argument fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33627 - 2013-01-28