Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3501 - 3510 of 12499 for mr.
Search results 3501 - 3510 of 12499 for mr.
State v. Peter Edge
-defendant’s sentencing hearing, the judge admonished the co-defendant to avoid Edge in the future because: Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10608 - 2005-03-31
-defendant’s sentencing hearing, the judge admonished the co-defendant to avoid Edge in the future because: Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10608 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Michael A. Stauffacher v. Douglas E. Stoneman
on that issue, Mr. Stoneman?” Stoneman again responded at length. At no point before the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10712 - 2017-09-20
on that issue, Mr. Stoneman?” Stoneman again responded at length. At no point before the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10712 - 2017-09-20
State v. John B. Beiswenger
requesting a breath test, something that would have been very simple for Mr. Beiswenger to have said, even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6341 - 2005-03-31
requesting a breath test, something that would have been very simple for Mr. Beiswenger to have said, even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6341 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
case without prejudice for a number of reasons. First and foremost, the State did attempt to bring Mr
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375113 - 2021-06-09
case without prejudice for a number of reasons. First and foremost, the State did attempt to bring Mr
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375113 - 2021-06-09
COURT OF APPEALS
at the residence or at the place that he was living at. I find that the defendant here and Mr. Stopher were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28728 - 2007-04-16
at the residence or at the place that he was living at. I find that the defendant here and Mr. Stopher were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28728 - 2007-04-16
City of Eau Claire v. Christopher A. Jerram
: THE COURT: That’s definitely disorderly conduct. He was screaming. MR. NICK [City Attorney]: That’s what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20984 - 2006-01-17
: THE COURT: That’s definitely disorderly conduct. He was screaming. MR. NICK [City Attorney]: That’s what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20984 - 2006-01-17
COURT OF APPEALS
never told Konkol he was free to leave and Kolbeck “would not have given Mr. Konkol any reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30099 - 2007-08-27
never told Konkol he was free to leave and Kolbeck “would not have given Mr. Konkol any reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30099 - 2007-08-27
[PDF]
State v. Frank Penigar, Jr.
] was going into this, and Mr. Penigar cut him off, Mr. Penigar just about came out of his seat and said
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12751 - 2017-09-21
] was going into this, and Mr. Penigar cut him off, Mr. Penigar just about came out of his seat and said
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12751 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Shah N. Mian
to Mr. Mian’s need for an interpreter.” The State argues, however, that “this court should rely upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15276 - 2017-09-21
to Mr. Mian’s need for an interpreter.” The State argues, however, that “this court should rely upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15276 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to give a young man of your age so much time, Mr. Cottingham, but again, you’re the person who is going
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138442 - 2017-09-21
to give a young man of your age so much time, Mr. Cottingham, but again, you’re the person who is going
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138442 - 2017-09-21