Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3501 - 3510 of 59264 for quit claim deed.
Search results 3501 - 3510 of 59264 for quit claim deed.
Nicholas C. L. v. Julie R. L.
the Court [is] not in agreement with quite a number of the … estrangement points, or the fringe parenting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25085 - 2006-06-27
the Court [is] not in agreement with quite a number of the … estrangement points, or the fringe parenting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25085 - 2006-06-27
[PDF]
State v. Rudolph L. Jackson
, Jackson’s attorney claimed that the prosecutor had breached the plea agreement. The trial court recessed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6652 - 2017-09-20
, Jackson’s attorney claimed that the prosecutor had breached the plea agreement. The trial court recessed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6652 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Village of Deerfield v. Curtis J. Philipp
by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what the proponent claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11782 - 2017-09-20
by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what the proponent claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11782 - 2017-09-20
Peggy Sue Podolak v. John Peter Podolak
the child income tax exemption. Peggy appeals. Discussion ¶5 Peggy first claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6283 - 2005-03-31
the child income tax exemption. Peggy appeals. Discussion ¶5 Peggy first claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6283 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Peggy Sue Podolak v. John Peter Podolak
appeals. DISCUSSION ¶5 Peggy first claims the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6283 - 2017-09-19
appeals. DISCUSSION ¶5 Peggy first claims the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6283 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
felonies and an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. He claims: (1) trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94664 - 2013-03-27
felonies and an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. He claims: (1) trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94664 - 2013-03-27
[PDF]
Village of Deerfield v.
by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what the proponent claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11781 - 2017-09-20
by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what the proponent claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11781 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of multiple felonies and an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. He claims: (1) trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94664 - 2014-09-15
of multiple felonies and an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. He claims: (1) trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94664 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Peter J. McMaster
, McMaster filed a motion to dismiss, claiming that the criminal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17014 - 2017-09-21
, McMaster filed a motion to dismiss, claiming that the criminal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17014 - 2017-09-21
State v. Peter J. McMaster
filed a motion to dismiss, claiming that the criminal prosecution under Wis. Stat. § 346.63 was barred
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17014 - 2005-03-31
filed a motion to dismiss, claiming that the criminal prosecution under Wis. Stat. § 346.63 was barred
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17014 - 2005-03-31