Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3501 - 3510 of 6188 for sheriff.
Search results 3501 - 3510 of 6188 for sheriff.
[PDF]
State v. Brian W. Easton
. BACKGROUND ¶2 The arresting deputy sheriff gave the following testimony at the hearing on Easton’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3102 - 2017-09-20
. BACKGROUND ¶2 The arresting deputy sheriff gave the following testimony at the hearing on Easton’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3102 - 2017-09-20
Douglas County v. Steven Leinweber
. Background ¶2 On the evening of October 20, 1999, Douglas County Sheriff Deputy William Webber
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2224 - 2005-03-31
. Background ¶2 On the evening of October 20, 1999, Douglas County Sheriff Deputy William Webber
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2224 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. A sheriff’s office evidence technician testified that she located two small stains in the area of the room
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379939 - 2021-06-22
. A sheriff’s office evidence technician testified that she located two small stains in the area of the room
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379939 - 2021-06-22
[PDF]
State v. Joseph P. Hogan
Deputy Sheriff Shane Heisser, who testified as follows. On April 3, 2003, at approximately 10:15 p.m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17631 - 2017-09-21
Deputy Sheriff Shane Heisser, who testified as follows. On April 3, 2003, at approximately 10:15 p.m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17631 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kurt J. Doerr
made at trial. Finally, Doerr claims that once he invoked his right to counsel, the sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13709 - 2014-09-15
made at trial. Finally, Doerr claims that once he invoked his right to counsel, the sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13709 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of the controlled substance oxycodone without a prescription, both on the same day. Card is a sheriff’s deputy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49414 - 2010-04-28
of the controlled substance oxycodone without a prescription, both on the same day. Card is a sheriff’s deputy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49414 - 2010-04-28
[PDF]
Daniel Shoop v. Samuel Carrasco
was sufficient to support the jury’s verdict. In particular, the court noted that a sheriff’s deputy testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4147 - 2017-09-20
was sufficient to support the jury’s verdict. In particular, the court noted that a sheriff’s deputy testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4147 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
25, 2011, at approximately 1:00 a.m., a Grant County Deputy Sheriff observed a vehicle pull
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94141 - 2014-09-15
25, 2011, at approximately 1:00 a.m., a Grant County Deputy Sheriff observed a vehicle pull
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94141 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
requirements. Accordingly, I affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 A Waupaca County Sheriff’s Department deputy pulled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572371 - 2022-09-29
requirements. Accordingly, I affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 A Waupaca County Sheriff’s Department deputy pulled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572371 - 2022-09-29
State v. Kurt J. Doerr
that once he invoked his right to counsel, the sheriff’s deputies were bound by the constitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13709 - 2005-03-31
that once he invoked his right to counsel, the sheriff’s deputies were bound by the constitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13709 - 2005-03-31