Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3501 - 3510 of 58267 for speedy trial.
Search results 3501 - 3510 of 58267 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
transaction with the CI. Ramos and Grimes were tried together in January 2015. ¶3 At trial, the CI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195065 - 2017-09-21
transaction with the CI. Ramos and Grimes were tried together in January 2015. ¶3 At trial, the CI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195065 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Wayne R. Anderson
modification motion. We reverse and remand for resentencing because: (1) Anderson’s trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13168 - 2017-09-21
modification motion. We reverse and remand for resentencing because: (1) Anderson’s trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13168 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Susanne M. Fulghum v. General Motors Corporation
. Scheer and Fulghum allege that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it prematurely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2993 - 2017-09-19
. Scheer and Fulghum allege that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it prematurely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2993 - 2017-09-19
Susanne M. Fulghum v. General Motors Corporation
accident. Scheer and Fulghum allege that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2993 - 2005-03-31
accident. Scheer and Fulghum allege that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2993 - 2005-03-31
State v. Wayne R. Anderson
because: (1) Anderson’s trial counsel was ineffective when he failed to seek an adjournment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13168 - 2005-03-31
because: (1) Anderson’s trial counsel was ineffective when he failed to seek an adjournment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13168 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas E. Richmond
from an order denying his postconviction motion. He claims the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11331 - 2005-03-31
from an order denying his postconviction motion. He claims the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11331 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Stanley Lindsey
2 disorderly conduct, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 974.01.2 The trial court sentenced Lindsey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2121 - 2017-09-19
2 disorderly conduct, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 974.01.2 The trial court sentenced Lindsey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2121 - 2017-09-19
State v. Ramon Sanchez-Diaz
and second-degree sexual assault. He also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16210 - 2005-03-31
and second-degree sexual assault. He also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16210 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Refugio A.
the competency issue. Refugio moved the trial court to vacate the § 938.12, STATS., judgment of delinquency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15354 - 2017-09-21
the competency issue. Refugio moved the trial court to vacate the § 938.12, STATS., judgment of delinquency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15354 - 2017-09-21
State v. Refugio A.
the competency issue. Refugio moved the trial court to vacate the § 938.12, Stats., judgment of delinquency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15354 - 2005-03-31
the competency issue. Refugio moved the trial court to vacate the § 938.12, Stats., judgment of delinquency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15354 - 2005-03-31