Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3501 - 3510 of 58458 for speedy trial.
Search results 3501 - 3510 of 58458 for speedy trial.
State v. Refugio A.
the competency issue. Refugio moved the trial court to vacate the § 938.12, Stats., judgment of delinquency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15354 - 2005-03-31
the competency issue. Refugio moved the trial court to vacate the § 938.12, Stats., judgment of delinquency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15354 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Refugio A.
the competency issue. Refugio moved the trial court to vacate the § 938.12, STATS., judgment of delinquency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15354 - 2017-09-21
the competency issue. Refugio moved the trial court to vacate the § 938.12, STATS., judgment of delinquency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15354 - 2017-09-21
State v. Wayne R. Anderson
because: (1) Anderson’s trial counsel was ineffective when he failed to seek an adjournment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13168 - 2005-03-31
because: (1) Anderson’s trial counsel was ineffective when he failed to seek an adjournment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13168 - 2005-03-31
Dolores L. Gilbert v. Raymond L. Gilbert
. On appeal, Raymond protests the trial court's refusal to adjourn the December 21, 1993, divorce trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7827 - 2005-03-31
. On appeal, Raymond protests the trial court's refusal to adjourn the December 21, 1993, divorce trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7827 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Wayne R. Anderson
modification motion. We reverse and remand for resentencing because: (1) Anderson’s trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13168 - 2017-09-21
modification motion. We reverse and remand for resentencing because: (1) Anderson’s trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13168 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Susanne M. Fulghum v. General Motors Corporation
. Scheer and Fulghum allege that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it prematurely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2993 - 2017-09-19
. Scheer and Fulghum allege that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it prematurely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2993 - 2017-09-19
Susanne M. Fulghum v. General Motors Corporation
accident. Scheer and Fulghum allege that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2993 - 2005-03-31
accident. Scheer and Fulghum allege that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2993 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
transaction with the CI. Ramos and Grimes were tried together in January 2015. ¶3 At trial, the CI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195065 - 2017-09-21
transaction with the CI. Ramos and Grimes were tried together in January 2015. ¶3 At trial, the CI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195065 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 1 The Honorable Thomas J. McAdams presided at trial and sentencing and entered the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252205 - 2020-01-14
. 1 The Honorable Thomas J. McAdams presided at trial and sentencing and entered the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252205 - 2020-01-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that the trial court erred with regard to two evidentiary decisions: excluding testimony she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186350 - 2017-09-21
argues that the trial court erred with regard to two evidentiary decisions: excluding testimony she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186350 - 2017-09-21